Comparison of the effectiveness of gestalt coaching training and acceptance and commitment-based therapy on controlling

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran (Corresponding author)

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

Aim and Background: Comparing different therapeutic approaches in psychology can help therapists identify their time, cost, and effectiveness; Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of Gestalt coaching training and treatment based on acceptance and commitment on controlling of Tehran Telecommunication Company employees.
Methods and Materials: The research method was quasi-experimental with pre-test, post-test and follow-up with control group. The statistical population included all employees of Perso Electronic Telecommunication Company in Tehran in 1398, from which according to Cohen's table, 45 people were selected by relative random sampling and randomly divided into two experimental groups and a control group. The research instruments included Taghizadeh Tendency to Control Others Questionnaire (1396). The experimental groups underwent Gestalt coaching training and acceptance and commitment treatment. Data were analyzed by repeated measures and ANOVA test.
Findings:
There was a significant difference between the effectiveness of Gestalt coaching training with acceptance and commitment-based treatment on reducing control (P ≤ 0.001). The effectiveness of gestalt training in both post-test and follow-up was more effective than acceptance and commitment therapy (P ≤ 0.001).
Conclusions: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that Gestalt coaching training and treatment based on acceptance and commitment can be a good way to reduce staff control.

Keywords

References

  1. Judrups J, Zandbergs U, Arhipova I, Vaisnore L. Architecture of a competence-based human resource
    development solution. Procedia Computer Science. 2015;77:184-90.
    2. Villemarette-Pittman NR, Stanford MS, Greve KW, Houston RJ, Mathias CW. Obsessive—compulsive
    personality disorder and behavioral disinhibition. The Journal of psychology. 2004;138(1):5-22.
    3. Ghazi Q. Dominance: From domination to self-construction. Tehran: Tehran; 2008.
    4. Glasser W. Reality therapy in action: HarperCollins Publishers; 2000.
    5. Shaw NE. The relationships between perceived parenting style, academic self-efficacy and college adjustment
    of freshman engineering students: University of North Texas; 2008.
    6. Renard L. Executive coaching for professional organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American
    University of London, London. 2005.
    7. Islambulchi M. Provide a model for cultivating entrepreneurial managers based on coaching. First Open
    Entrepreneurship and Innovation Conference; Tehran: Razi Conference Center; 2015.
    8. Farrands B. A gestalt approach to strategic team change. OD Practitioner. 2012;44(4):18-23.
    9. Stevenson H. Gestalt coaching. Od Practitioner. 2005;37(4):42.
    10. Maurer R. The gestalt approach to resistance in coaching. Organizational Coaching and Change. 2011:91.
    11. Partridge C, Spoth J. Deepening Awareness: A Gestalt Approach to Coaching. Coaching Today. 2013:7ff.
    12. Simon SN. Applying Gestalt theory to coaching. Gestalt Review. 2009;13(3):230-40.
    13. Nazari I, Mohammadi M, Nazeri G. Effectiveness of Gestalt therapy on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
    symptoms on veterans of Yasuj city. Armaghane danesh. 2014;19(4):295-304.
    14. Haji Hassani M, Saadipour I, Jafarnejad H, Rostami K, Pirsaghi F. The effectiveness of active music therapy
    and gestalt therapy on reducing test anxiety. Thought and Behavior. 2012;6(23):20-9.
    15. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: American Psychological
    Association Washington, DC; 2009.
    16. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of
    mindful change: Guilford Press; 2011.
    17. Aumann II CM. The effects of gestalt awareness training versus rational emotive behavioral therapy video
    training on the anxiety, self-efficacy, and basic counseling skill competency of counselor trainees: Wayne State
    University; 2004.
    18.Ismaili A, Rahimi F, Nadaf M. Investigating the effect of organizational coaching on unproductive individual
    behaviors in the workplace: The mediating role of a positive organizational climate. Management Research in
    Iran. 2016;21(3):167-91.
    19.Barati A, Ebrahimi MI, Firoozeh Z. Comparison of the effectiveness of gestalt coaching training and
    acceptance and commitment-based therapy on emotional intelligence and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in
    Behavioural Sciences. 2021;18(4):930-40.
    20. Ayoubi F, Ghodrati S, Razavi MS. The Effectiveness of Gestalt Group Counseling on Emotional Intelligence
    of Students Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2016;3(3):110-24.
  2.  
medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences
Volume 64, Issue 3
September and October 2021
Pages 3196-3207

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics