مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

بررسی عوامل شغلی مرتبط با ابتلاء به عفونت کووید19 در بیماران بستری شده در بیمارستان‌ امام رضا (ع) مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
احسان رفیعی منش 1
لحیا افشاری صالح 2
شبنم نیرومند 3
هانیه نیک پور 4
1 دانشیار گروه طب کار و بیماری های شغلی ، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 متخصص طب کار و بیماریهای شغلی، فلوشیپ اختلالات خواب، دانشیار گروه طب کار و بیماری های شغلی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد،
3 استادیار گروه پزشکی اجتماعی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
4 دستیار تخصصی گروه طب کار و بیماری های شغلی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران)
10.22038/mjms.2025.71005.4216
چکیده
مقدمه: بیماری کرونا ویروس 2019 بعنوان چالش برانگیزترین فاجعه در جهان بوده که اقدامات پیشگیرانه و کنترلی برای محافظت از کارگران در مواجهه با ویروس کرونا، بستگی به نوع کار انجام شده، ریسک مواجهه با افراد آلوده و آلودگی محیط کار دارد. هدف از مطالعه ، بررسی عوامل شغلی مرتبط با ابتلاء به عفونت کووید-19 در بیماران بستری شده می باشد.
روش بررسی: این مطالعه مقطعی در سال 1399-400 در بخش کرونا بیمارستان امام رضا مشهد انجام شد. پس از کسب مجوزهای اخلاقی، با مراجعه حضوری به بخشهای کووید بیمارستان، چک لیستی حاوی متعیرهای مطالعه توسط بیماران و یا خانواده انها پر شد. در نهایت داده ها وارد Spss-V20 شده و توسط شاخص های مرکزی و پراکندگی و آزمونهای Anova و فیشر آنالیزگردید. Pvalue=0.05 به عنوان سطح معناداری آماری در نظر گرفته شد.
یافته ها: 87 % از بیماران مرد و میانگین سنی افراد مورد مطالعه 10.64±45.67 سال بود. بیشترین فراوانی محل ابتلا به عفونت مربوط به جامعه (61.2 %) و محل کار (57.8 %) بود. 42.2 % از بیماران مشاغل اداری-دفتری داشتند. ریسک فاکتورها شامل تماس شغلی در 53.4 % ، استفاده از وسایل حمل و نقل عمومی در 44.8 % ، نبود سیستم تهویه مناسب در محل کار در 9.6 % از بیماران بود.
نتیجه گیری: مواجهات شغلی می تواند تاثیرات بسزایی در ابتلا به کووید-19دارد. ارائه آموزش های لازم در محل کار، استفاده صحیح از تجهیزات حفاظت فردی می تواند باعث کاهش خطر ابتلا به کووید-19 در میان کارکنان گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
کووید-19
شغل
عوامل شغلی
ریسک فاکتورها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the occupational factors related to the infection of COVID-19 in patients admitted to Imam Reza (AS) hospital in Mashhad

نویسندگان English

ehsan Rafiei Manesh 1
Lahia Afshari Saleh 2
Shabnam Niromand 3
haniyeh nikpour 4
1 Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Medicine and Occupational Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 specialist in occupational medicine and occupational diseases, sleep disorders, associate professor, department of Occupational medicine and occupational Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4 resident of Occupational Medicine and Occupational Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

INTRODUCTION: Preventive and control measures to protect workers against COVID-19 infection depend on the type of work performed and the risk of exposure to infected people and contamination of the work environment. The purpose of this study is to investigate the occupational factors associated with COVID-19 infection in patients.
MATERIAL & METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Covid-19 department of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad in 2020-2021. The participants were patients admitted to the hospital's COVID-19 ward. After obtaining ethical permissions from the university, how to complete the checklist was explained to the patients, and in the case of critically ill patients, their families were contacted and filled out. Finally, the data was analyzed SPSS 20 software. Central indices and frequency distribution and Fisher's tests were used to compare qualitative variables between job groups. The significance level is 0.05.
RESULT: 334 (87%) of the patients were male and the average age of the studied subjects was 45.67 ± 10.64 years. The highest frequency of the place of infection of COVID-19 was related to the community (61.2 %) and then to the workplace (57.8 %). 42.2% of patients had administrative-office jobs. Infection risk factors included occupational contact in 53.4%, use of public transportation in 44.8% and lack of proper ventilation system in the workplace in 9.6% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Occupational exposures have significant effects on contracting COVID-19 in working population. Providing necessary training at the workplace can reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19 among employees in different jobs.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

COVID-19
Occupational
Risk factors
  1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506.
  2. Xu X, Chen P, Wang J, Feng J, Zhou H, Li X, et al. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Science China Life Sciences. 2020;63:457-60.
  3. Hassan SA, Sheikh FN, Jamal S, Ezeh JK, Akhtar A. Coronavirus (COVID-19): a review of clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. Cureus. 2020;12(3).
  4. Wu W, Wang A, Liu M. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395(10223):497-506.
  5. Ranasinghe R, Damunupola A, Wijesundara S, Karunarathna C, Nawarathna D, Gamage S, et al. Tourism after corona: Impacts of COVID 19 pandemic and way forward for tourism, hotel and mice industry in Sri Lanka. Hotel Mice Industry in Sri Lanka. 2020.
  6. Marinaccio A, Boccuni F, Rondinone BM, Brusco A, D'Amario S, Iavicoli S. Occupational factors in the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: compensation claims applications support establishing an occupational surveillance system. Occupational Environmental Medicine. 2020;77(12):818-21.
  7. Aljabri D, Alshatti F, Alumran A, Al-Rayes S, Alsalman D, Althumairi A, et al. Sociodemographic and occupational factors associated with burnout: a study among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10.
  8. Wang W, Tang J, Wei F. Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019‐nCoV) in Wuhan, China. Journal of medical virology. 2020;92(4):441-7.
  9. Khajuria A, Tomaszewski W, Liu Z, Chen J-h, Mehdian R, Fleming S, et al. Workplace factors associated with mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international cross-sectional study. BMC health services research. 2021;21:1-11.
  10. Liew MF, Siow WT, MacLaren G, See KC. Preparing for COVID-19: early experience from an intensive care unit in Singapore. Critical Care. 2020;24:1-3.
  11. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin D-Y, Chen L, et al. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. Jama. 2020;323(14):1406-7.
  12. Rebmann T, Wilson R, LaPointe S, Russell B, Moroz D. Hospital infectious disease emergency preparedness: a 2007 survey of infection control professionals. American journal of infection control. 2009;37(1):1-8.
  13. Brosseau LM. Are powered air purifying respirators a solution for protecting healthcare workers from emerging aerosol-transmissible diseases? Annals of Work Exposures. 2020;64(4):339-41.
  14. Baker MG, Peckham TK, Seixas NS. Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: a key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0232452.
  15. Organization WH. Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations: scientific brief, 29 March 2020. World Health Organization; 2020.
  16. Kuster SP, Coleman BL, Raboud J, McNeil S, De Serres G, Gubbay J, et al. Risk factors for influenza among health care workers during 2009 pandemic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Emerging infectious diseases. 2013;19(4):606.
  17. Kawana A, Teruya K, Kirikae T, Sekiguchi J-i, Kato Y, Kuroda E, et al. " Syndromic surveillance within a hospital" for the early detection of a nosocomial outbreak of acute respiratory infection. Japanese journal of infectious diseases. 2006;59(6):377.
  18. Seto W-H, Cowling BJ, Lam H-S, Ching PT, To M-L, Pittet D. Clinical and nonclinical health care workers faced a similar risk of acquiring 2009 pandemic H1N1 infection. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011;53(3):280.
  19. Lau J, Yang X, Tsui H, Kim J. Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health. 2003;57(11):864-70.
  20. Sikkema RS, Farag EA, Himatt S, Ibrahim AK, Al-Romaihi H, Al-Marri SA, et al. Risk factors for primary Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in camel workers in Qatar during 2013–2014: a case-control study. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2017;215(11):1702-5.
  21. Organization WH. Home care for patients with suspected novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection presenting with mild symptoms and management of contacts: Interim guidance. Home care for patients with suspected novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection presenting with mild symptoms and management of contacts: Interim guidance2020. p. 4-.
  22. Webster RK, Liu R, Karimullina K, Hall I, Amlot R, Rubin GJ. A systematic review of infectious illness presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors. BMC public health. 2019;19(1):1-13.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 68، شماره 2
خرداد-تیر1404
خرداد و تیر 1404
صفحه 309-318