Presenting a Conceptual Model for Evaluating the Implementation of Administrative System Policy: A Case Study of Executive Bodies and Medical Universities of Semnan Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Public Administration, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

2 Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)

3 Department of Industrial Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the formulation of general policies of the administrative system, development programs, etc., in the eleventh and twelfth governments, as well as the adaptation of these policies in institutions related to public health, the purpose of this study is to provide a conceptual model of dimensions, categories. Macro and basic is the evaluation of administrative system reform programs implemented in medical universities in Semnan province.
Methods: The research paradigm is an interpretation that was used with an inductive approach of the data theory theory strategy, in addition to the data obtained from the review of relevant texts, the opinions of presenters, observers and policy makers are also used; Thus, while analyzing the content of texts related to policy evaluation, administrative reform programs and documents related to the administrative reform program, snowball sampling was used to obtain the opinions of stakeholders. In this study, after interviewing 12 people in 37 sessions No new data appeared and theoretical saturation occurred.
Results:  Extracting a systemic conceptual model from the administrative system reform programs of the first and second periods implemented in the executive bodies of Semnan University of Medical Sciences includes 280 basic concepts, 71 basic categories, 9 macro categories and six dimensions.
Conclusion: Current evaluation of administrative policy in the executive organs of Semnan province with characteristics; Method-oriented, goal-oriented, retrospective and focused on the implementation of the policy-making process that these results can be used in designing a comprehensive system of administrative policy evaluation of medical universities in Semnan province.

Keywords

References

  1. Doke PP. Comprehensive index for community health assessment of typical district administrative
    units in Maharashtra state, India. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian
    Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2016;41(4):288.
    2. Kind P, Gudex CM. Measuring health status in the community: a comparison of methods. Journal of
    Epidemiology & Community Health. 1994;48(1):86-91.
    3. Danaeifard H. Challenges of public administration in Iran. Tehran: Samat; 2012.
    4. Mir Mohammadi SM, Izadkhah MM. Applying the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) model in the
    evaluation, implementation and general policies of the administrative system. Public Management Outlook.
    2011;11:15-31.
    5. Alvani M, Sharifzadeh F. General Policy Making Process. Edition F, editor. Tehran: Allameh
    Tabatabai University; 2015. 2 p.
    6. Knill C, Tosun J. Public policy: A new introduction: Red Globe Press; 2020.
    7. Ebadi MH, Rezaei MJ. Pathology The position of monitoring and evaluation in Iran's development
    planning. Strategic and Macro Policies. 2017;6(21):1-23.
    8. Hosseinpour D, Sharifzadeh F, Nouri R, Karimian O. Evaluation of economic policies approved by
    the Islamic Consultative Assembly using the data theory of the foundation. Management of Government
    Organizations. 2019;7(2):135-48.
    9. vaezi R, Mohammadi M. A Model for Evaluating Public Policies in Iran (Study of Value Added Tax
    Policy). Public Management Perspectives,. 1396;29(1):47-72.
    10. Ebadi MH, Rezaei MJ. Pathology The position of monitoring and evaluation in Iran's development
    planning. Strategic and Macro Policies. 2017;6(21):1-23.
    11. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Henry GT. Evaluation: A systematic approach: Sage publications; 2018.
    12. Stufflebeam DL, Coryn CL. Evaluation theory, models, and applications: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
    13. Owen JM. Evaluation forms: toward an inclusive framework for evaluation practice. Evaluation roots:
    Tracing theorists’ views and influences. 2004;356:370.
    14. Hansen HF. Choosing evaluation models: A discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation.
    2005;11(4):447-62.
    15. Faqihi AH, Alizadeh M. Validity in qualitative research. Management Culture. 2005;3(9):5-19.
    16. Hamidi K, Aliakbar A, Karamolah D, Asghar S. A model for evaluation of human resource
    development policies of government employees. Modiriat-e- farda. 2018;57(17):67-82.
    17. Danaei Fard H, Shokri Z, Fani AA, Forouzandeh L. Provide model Factors Effective On Evaluation
    Quality General Drawings Iran. Military management. 2016;16(4):42-66.
  2.  
medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences
Volume 63, Issue 5
January and February 2021
Pages 2937-2981

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics