Explaining the feeling of social security of women in public spaces of Arak city

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Social Sciences, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran. (Corresponding Author)

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The issue of women's social security in public spaces has become one of the most important issues as it has a direct relationship with their participation and well-being in society. The purpose of this study is to investigate the level of social security of women and study the factors affecting it.
Methods: The research method is a survey and the data collection tool is an interview-based on a questionnaire. The statistical population of the study is all young women aged 15-75 living in Arak. The sample size is based on Cochran's formula and error compensation due to incomplete questionnaires of 400 people. A multi-stage cluster sampling method based on regions and statistical blocks has been used.
ResultsThe results showed that the level of social security of women is slightly below average and among the components of security, women feel the most lack of psychological, occupational, financial, and personal security, respectively. Factors such as social capital, attitudes toward the police and gender values and attitudes, irregularities, high-risk lifestyles, economic and social status, age, and marital status are also linked to women's security through mechanisms such as social protection and social control.
Conclusion: It can be recommended that policy interventions to strengthen women's social security should be aimed at improving their social and physical environments rather than behavioral characteristics. In general, a set of factors that have structural rather than behavioral characteristics affect women's social security.

Keywords

References

  1. Wæver O, Carlton D. Identity, migration and the new security agenda in Europe: Pinter Publishers; 1993.
  2. Rafiei M, Ghaffari H, Paknia M. Review of the Effect of Indicators of Sustainable Urban Development on Social Security of Citizens. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2021;9(3):99-112.
  3. Majidi Khameneh B, Aghaei P, Zarghami S, Raesi H. Analyzing the Influential Components on Women’s Sense of Social Security in Public Green Spaces (A Case Study of Niavaran Park, District 1 of Tehran Municipality). 2020;13(50):1-20.
  4. sharbatian MH, Danesh P, Ahmadi A. The Sociological Study of Factors Affecting Women's Social Security in Mashhad as a Metropolis. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society. 2015;6(21):143-66.
  5. Nowruzi F, Fooladi S. Investigating the feeling of social security of women aged 15-29 in Tehran and social factors affecting i. Strategy. 2014;18(53):59-129.
  6. Meshkini A, Rahimi H, Salehi E. The Perception of Neighborhood Safety and the Use of Public Spaces Gender and Age-Based Contrast in Inner City of Tehran. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2013;11(1):125-50.
  7. Rastegar K, Haqiqat F. Investigating the relationship between social security and supervision (natural and abnormal) and social health among women 18 years and older living in Shiraz. Women and society. 2016;6(3):104-79.
  8. Tabrizi LR, Madanipour A. Crime and the city: Domestic burglary and the built environment in Tehran. Habitat International. 2006;30(4):932-44.
  9. Sarukhani B, Navidnia M. Social security of family and residence in Tehran. Social Welfare. 2004;6(22):107-87.
  10. Mir Mohammad tabar A. Study of factors affecting women's sense of social security (Meta-analysis of existing research). Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2017;14(4):123-56.
  11. Ghulam Niarmi A. Sociological assessment of the four dimensions of social security among female-headed households (Case study: female-headed households in Tehran). . Women's Research Journal. 2016;8(3):86-69.
  12. Shariati Mazinani S, Foroghzadeh S. urban public spaces and women security: The case study of Mashhad. Strategic Research on Social Problems in Iran University of Isfahan. 2017;6(4):71-90.
  13. Rahimi L. The security of Women in the Urban Public Spaces and the effective physical factors (Case study: The Elgoli Park of Tabriz). Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2018;15(4):39-77.
  14. Saghaei M, Fattah F, Mitra P. An analysis of urban spaces and women's social securit. Spatio-temporal research. 2016;5(1):60-42.
  15. Mohammadi Birang M, Azae A. Analyzing Women's Sense of Security in Public Spaces with Emphasis on Urban Parks, Case Study. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches. 2019;10(20):27-40.
  16. Evaluation women's sense of security in urban areas (Case Study: Region 1 of Ahvaz City). Motaleate Shahri. 2017;6(23):53-68.
  17. Sajadi H. A comprehensive interpretation of Societal security in a case study of Iran. Sociological Cultural Studies. 2021;12(1):99-129.
  18. Serajzadeh H, Mohammadi F, Jameh Shoorany M. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies on Societal Security in Iran. Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research. 2020;9(16):183-207.
  19. Pain RH. Social geographies of women's fear of crime. Transactions of the Institute of British geographers. 1997:231-44.
  20. Viswanath K, Mehrotra ST. 'Shall we go out?'Women's safety in public spaces in delhi. Economic and political weekly. 2007:1542-8.
  21. Paul T. Space, gender, and fear of crime: Some explorations from Kolkata. Gender, Technology and Development. 2011;15(3):411-35.
  22. Koskela H, Pain R. Revisiting fear and place: women's fear of attack and the built environment. Geoforum. 2000;31(2):269-80.
  23. Wilson JQ, Kelling GL. Broken windows. Atlantic monthly. 1982;249(3):29-38.
  24. Shaw CR, McKay HD. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. 1942.
  25. Vold GB. Theoretical criminology. 1958.
  26. Cockerham WC. The social determinants of the decline of life expectancy in Russia and Eastern Europe: a lifestyle explanation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1997:117-30.
  27. Newman O. Creating defensible space. US department of housing and urban development, office of policy development and research. Institute for Community Design Analysis, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, Washington, DC. 1996.
  28. Donnelly PG. Newman, Oscar: defensible space theory. 2010.
  29. Cohen LE, Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American sociological review. 1979:588-608.
  30. Brantingham P, Brantingham P, Wortley R, Mazerolle L. Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Devon: Willan Publishing. 2008.
  31. Ejtehadi M, Qaderi S, Khezri F. Urban Sociological Studies. 2019;9(32):1-32.
  32. Brown JM, Walklate SL. Handbook on sexual violence: Routledge; 2011.
  33. Zetomka P. Trust sociological theories. 2, editor. Tehran: Shirazeh; 2011.
Medical Journal of Mashhad university of Medical Sciences
Volume 64, Issue 5
March and April 2022
Pages 4083-4096

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics