A Long Delay in Definite Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis and the Role of Physician Delay

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

 




ntroduction: The incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in our region is high . Despite the recent advances in medicine, still many patients suffer from longstanding tuberculosis. Delay in diagnosis may result in further morbidity and mortality. So, the goal of this study to evaluate the patient delay and physician delay.
Matherials and Methods: A descriptive study was done from 2004 to 2007 at Imam Reza Hospital on 86 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Those patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria undervent a face to face interview and then the questioner's checklist was filled out. The interval between the first appearance of the clinical manifestation and first visit to the physician was considered the patient delay and the period between the patient's first visits to the final diagnosis was the physician's delay. Gathered data was analyzed with analyctic methods and T test.
Result: The mean patient delay time was 14/69 +10/91 with a median of 12/5 days. The mean physician delay time was 84/30 +42/75 with a median of 80 days. The mean total delay time was 99 +44/70 days with a median of 92/50 days.
Conclusion:According to this studythe patient delay in our region is acceptable in comparison with other studies, but our physician delay was long. Thus improving and upgrading the mycobacteriological courses for general physicians and specialists is recommended.

Keywords

References

1- World Healt Organization: Global Tuberculosis control surveillance, planning and Financing. WHO Report
2004(WHO/HTM/TB).2004; 331.
2- WHO. WHO Report 2001. Global Tuberculosis control. Communicable Disease. WHO, Geneva, WHO/ CDS / TB /
2001; 287.
3- Velayati Ak. Tuberculosis. In Azizi F, Hatami H, Janghorbani M. Epidemiology and common disease prevention in
IRAN. 1th ed. Tehran: Eshtiyagh press; 2000: 602 – 618.
4- Toman K. Tuberculosis case finding and chemotherapy questions and answers. Geneva: WHO; 979.
5- WHO. Groups at risk. WHO Report on tuberculosis Epidemic. 1996.
6- Lienhardt C, Rowley J, Manneh K, Lahai G, Needham D, Milligan P, et al . Factors affecting time delay to treatment
in a tuberculosis control program in a sub- saharn African country: the experience of the Gambia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
2001; 5: 233-239.
7- Madebo T, Lindtjorn B. Delay in treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: an analysis of symptom duration among
Ethiopian patients. Med Gen Med 1999; 6.
8- Beyers N, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, Van Zyl S, Nel ED, Talent JM, et al . Delay in the diagnosis, notification, and
initiation of treatment and compliance in children with tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis. 1994; 75: 260-265.
9- Gulbaran Z, Pretet S, Dusser D. From first symptom to diagnosis and from diagnosis to treatment of tuberculosis,
still a long delay. Rev Pneumol Clin 1996; 52: 20-25.
10-Wndwalo ER, Morkve O. Delay in tuberculosis case finding and treatment in Mwanz: Tanzania. Int J Tuberc Lung
Dis 2000; 4:133- 138.
11- Masjedi MR, Chragvandi A, Hadian M, Velayati AA. Pateint delay and treatment delay in patients with pulmonary
tuberculosis. Pajohesh in Pezeshki. 1995; 19: 707.
12- Mirsaeidi SM, Tabarsi P, Mohajer K, Falah- Tafti S, Jammati HR, Farnia P, Mansouri SD, Masjedi MR, Velayati
AA et al.A long delay from first symptom to definite diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Iranian Med 2007;
10(2): 190- 193. 
medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences
Volume 51, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
March and April 2007
Pages 37-40

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics