Evaluation of Visual Evoked Potentials’ Findings in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate professor of neurology Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Neurologist, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

3 Assistant professor of Neurology, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 MSc

Abstract

Introduction
Multiple Sclerosis is one of the commonest neurological disorders that because of its different clinical presentation, recurrent and progressive attacks, and age spectrum of patients who are usually young, has particular importance. Optic neuritis is common in MS patients and VEP is abnormal in most of the patients with optic neuritis. VEP is also abnormal in most of the MS patients who do not have the history of optic neuritis. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of VEP in MS patients with and without the history of optic neuritis.
Materials and Methods
This study included 80 patients with definite MS diagnosis who referred to the MS Clinic Ghaem Hospital. A questionnaire used to collect the patients demographic and illness history. Patients were divided into two groups based on the history of optic neuritis. The full neurological examination including VEP carried out for the patients. Collected data analyzed with SPSS and statistical tests.
Results
The abnormal VEP found in 92.2% of patients with the history of optic neuritis. The incidence of VEP in patients without the history of optic neuritis was 57.5%. The VEP abnormality recorded 40.5% unilateral and 59.5% bilateral in the first group of patients. In the second group the VEP was 87% unilateral and 13% bilateral.
Conclusion
Many MS patients without the history of optic neuritis, had abnormal VEP, therefore VEP can be used for the early diagnosis of MS. Although, patients with the history of optic neuritis will have significant improvement with the time, but many cases with increased P100 latency is persistence, and can be used as a marker of the pervious optic neuritis attack.

Keywords

References

1- 2-Saud A. Sadiq, Multiple sclerosis. In: Rowland PL.editor. Merritt's neurology.11th ed Philadelphia: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2005.p. 941.
2- Optic Neuritis Group Study, Multiple Sclerosis risk after optic neuritis: final optic neuritis treatment trial follow up.
Arch Neurol 2008; 65:727-732.
3- Olek JM, Dawson MD. Multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous
system. In: Bradly GW, Daroff BR, Fenichel MG, Jan Kovic J, editors. Neurology in clinical practice. 3th ed. United
states of America: Butter Worth / Heinemann; 2004. p.1631-1664.
4- Mattews WB, Small M. Pattern reversal evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 40:1009-1041.
5- Celesia GG .Visual evoked potentials in clinical neurology. In: Aminoff MJ. Electrodiagnosis in clinical neurology.
5th ed . Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill. Livingstone; 2005.p.452-471.
6-Alehashmi A. Evaluation of cognitive disorders in MS patients in Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical
Sciences, 1382.
7- Haliday AM , Mc Donald WI , Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1998; 6: 982-985.
8- Becker WJ, Richards IM. Serial pattern shift visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 1994; 11: 53- 59.
9- Kofler B. Visual and acoustic evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Wien Med Wochenschr 1995; 135:35-38. 
medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences
Volume 51, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
November and December 2008
Pages 203-208

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics