نقش باورهای خودکارآمدی در فرایند یادگیری زبان با توجه به مهارت‎های ‎زبانی: رویکرد روان شناسی زبان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه زبان شناسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

چکیده

مقدمه: نگاهی نو به علوم از جمله نگاه روان شناختی به کارکردهای شناختی ذهن از جمله زبان از تحقیقات مورد علاقه دانشمندان می‎باشد. بنابراین، هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش باورهای خودکارآمدی در فرایند یادگیری زبان با توجه به مهارت‎های ‎زبانی می‎باشد.
روش کار: روش تحقیق توصیفی-همبستگی می‎باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق فراگیران زبان موسسه سفیر 8 تا 11 ساله شهر مشهد در سال 1399 می‎باشد که 112 نفر از آن‌ها به روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. به‌منظور جمع­آوری داده­ها از پرسش‌نامه­های استاندارد آزمون رشد زبان نیوکامر و هامیل (1998) و باورهای خودکارآمدی تحصیلی (ASEBQ) استفاده شد.  جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده­ها از آزمون آماری پیرسون استفاده گردید و نرم افزار مورد استفاده SPSS نسخه 25  بود. 
نتایج: نتایج نشان داد که بین باورهای خودکارآمدی و مولفه‎های ‎مهارت‎های ‎زبانی (زبان گفتاری، گوش دادن، سازمان دهی، صحبت کردن، معناشناسی و نحو) رابطه مثبت و معنی داری وجود دارد (001/0 P≤).
نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می‎رسد که متغیر روان شناختی باورهای خودکارآمدی می‎تواند روی مهارت‎های ‎زبانی این دامنه سنی اثرگذار باشد. در این راستا در جهت بالا رفتن اعتبار بیرونی تحقیق پیشنهاد می‎گردد تحقیقات بیشتری صورت گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of self-efficacy beliefs in the language learning process according to language skills: a language psychology approach

نویسنده [English]

  • Yosef Hazrati
Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
چکیده [English]

Introduction: A new look at science, including a psychological look at the cognitive functions of the mind, including language, is one of the favorite researches of scientists. Therefore, the purpose of this research is the role of self-efficacy beliefs in the process of language learning with regard to language skills.
Methods: The research method is descriptive-correlation. The statistical population of the research is the 8-11-year-old language learners of Safir Institute in Mashhad in 2019, of which 112 people were selected as a sample by simple random sampling. In order to collect data, the standard questionnaires of Newcomer and Hamill (1998) language development test and academic self-efficacy beliefs (ASEBQ) were used. To analyze the data, Pearson's statistical test was used and the software used was SPSS version 25.
Results: The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and components of language skills (spoken language, listening, organization, speaking, semantics and syntax) (P≤0.001).
ConclusionIt seems that the psychological variable of self-efficacy beliefs can affect the language skills of this age range. In this regard, in order to increase the external validity of the research, it is suggested to conduct more research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Self-Efficacy Beliefs
  • Learning Process
  • Language Skills
  • Language Psychology
Goldin-Meadow S, Levine SC, Hedges LV, Huttenlocher J, Raudenbush SW, Small SL. New evidence
about language and cognitive development based on a longitudinal study: hypotheses for intervention.
American Psychologist. 2014;69(6):588.
2. Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Springer; 1999.
3. Wang C, Kim D-H, Bai R, Hu J. Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language
learners in China. System. 2014;44:24-33.
4. Wang C, Bong M, Ahn HS. Korean college students' self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy
beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal. 2013;15(3):81-112.
5. Wang C, Schwab G, Fenn P, Chang M. Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English
language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational
and Developmental Psychology. 2013;3(1):173.
6. Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ. Influencing children's self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and
writing through modeling. Reading & writing quarterly. 2007;23(1):7-25.
7. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research. 1996;66(4):543-78.
8. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents.
2006;5(1):307-37.
9. Jalaluddin I, Yunus MM, Yamat H, Jusoff HK. A Case Study on Teacher's Assistance in Writing
Classroom: A Look at the Effects on Rural Learners' Writing Self-efficacy. International Journal of
Learning. 2010;17.)9(
10. Woodrow L. College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System. 2011;39(4):510-22.
11. Hung LNQ. A social cognitive and cross cultural investigation of performance appraisal in Australian
and Vietnamese universities. 2013.
12. Nguyễn TTH .Self-efficacy of native and non-native English speaker teachers= Hiệu lực bản thân của
giáo viên tiếng Anh bản ngữ và không bản ngữ. MA Thesis Linguistics: 60 14 10: University of
Languages and International Studies; 2011.
13. Phan NTT, Locke T. Sources of self-efficacy of Vietnamese EFL teachers: A qualitative study. Teaching
and Teacher Education. 2015;52:73-82.
14. Borg M. Key concepts in ELT. Teachers' beliefs. ELT journal. 2001;55(2):186-8.
15. Hasanzadeh S, Minaei A. Adaptation and Standardization of the Test of TOLD-P: 3 for Farsi - Speaking
Children of Tehran. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2002;1(2):119-34.
16. Zajacova A, Lynch SM, Espenshade TJ. Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research
in higher education. 2005;46:677.706-
17. Harley TA. The psychology of language: From data to theory: Psychology press; 2013.
18. Mercer N. The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of
cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational
Psychologist. 2013;48(3):148-68.
19. Friederici AD. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological reviews.
2011;91(4):1357-92.
20. Aben JE, Timmermans AC, Dingyloudi F, Lara MM, Strijbos J-W. What influences students' peerfeedback uptake? Relations between error tolerance, feedback tolerance, writing self-efficacy, perceived
language skills and peer-feedback processing. Learning and Individual Differences. 2022;97:102175.
21. Er S, Aral N, Bıçakçı MY. Identifying the Relationship between Children's Language Skills and Parent's
Self-efficacy in Story Reading. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;93:1269-74.
22. Zarrinabadi N, Mohammadabadi AM, Abbasi Z. My language ability could have been better or worse:
Examining how upward and downward counterfactual thinking predict self-efficacy and language
performance. Learning and Motivation. 2023;82:101893.
23. Dickinson DK, Tabors PO. Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and
school: Paul H Brookes Publishing; 2001.
24. Kotaman H. ANA-BABALARIN HİKÂYE KİTABI OKUMAYA İLİŞKİN ÖZYETERLİLİK ÖLÇEĞİ.
Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009;7(4):767-80.
25. Jamieson DG. Language development in young children. Early childhood learning knowledge centre
Dimuat turun daripada http://www ccl-cca ca/pdfs/ECLKC/bulletin/ECLKCBulletinLanguage pdf. 2009.
26. Cameron L. Teaching languages to young learners: Cambridge university press; 2001.
27. Garvie E. Story as vehicle: Teaching English to young children: Multilingual Matters Limited; 1990.
28. Isbell R, Sobol J, Lindauer L, Lowrance A. The effects of storytelling and story reading on the oral
language complexity and story comprehension of young children. Early childhood education journal.
2004;32:157-63.
29. .29 Wing-Yin Chow B, McBride-Chang C. Promoting language and literacy development through
parent–child reading in Hong Kong preschoolers. Early Education and Development. 2003;14(2):233-48