نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مشاوره و روانشناسی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه مشاوره و روانشناسی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.(نویسنده مسئول)
3 دانشیار گروه روش ها و برنامه‌های آموزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction: Pseudo-psychology is a non-scientific approach to psychology and clinical psychology that is adopted by quacks. The current study aimed to investigate the harms related to Pseudo-psychology from the point of view of clients in Iran.
Method: The present research method was qualitative and descriptive phenomenology. For this, 20 male and female references who were victims of false psychology have been studied by conducting in-depth interviews. Simultaneously with the data collection, audio implementation, text rereading, identifying important and relevant items, coding and categorizing and presenting the findings were done with MAXQDA software.
Results: The findings showed that Pseudo-psychology damages are multifaceted and include emotional harms, financial damages, unprincipled intervention, stigma, and ethical damages. By highlighting the significant harms associated with pseudo-psychology in Iran, this study emphasizes the urgent need to increase the regulation and supervision of pseudo-psychology to prevent harm at the level of public health.
Conclusion: The implications of this study extend to policymakers, mental health professionals, and the general population, highlighting the importance of evidence-based psychological interventions. Future research should examine the effectiveness of regulatory measures to prevent the spread of pseudo-psychology and protect public mental health.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)