مقایسه اثربخشی ایماگوتراپی و زوج درمانی هیجان مدار بر بهزیستی روان شناختی زوجین ناسازگار و درگیرخیانت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری روانشناسی تخصصی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران

2 دانشیارگروه روانشناسی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران

3 استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف مقایسه اثربخشی ایماگوتراپی و زوج درمانی هیجان مدار بر بهزیستی روان شناختی زوجین ناسازگار و درگیرخیانت انجام شد.
روش کار: روش این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ شیوه اجراء، آزمایشی و در قالب طرح پیش آزمون-پس آزمون، با یک گروه کنترل و دو گروه آزمایش صورت گرفت. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل کلیه زوج های داوطلبی بود که به فراخوان اعلام شده از سوی مراکز پاسخ داده و ثبت نام نمودند. این زوج‎ها به دلیل مشکلات مربوط به خیانت به یکی از مراکز مشاوره ناحیه 2 شهر نوشهر در سال 1396 مراجعه کرده بودند. سپس 33 زوج واجد شرایط،‎ به صورت جایگزینی تصادفی در 3 گروه ایماگوتراپی (11 زوج)،‎ زوج درمانی هیجان مدار (11 زوج) و گروه کنترل (11 زوج) جایگزین شدند. روش نمونه گیری به صورت در دسترس انجام شد. اطلاعات با دو روش کتابخانه ای و میدانی جمع آوری شد. برای جمع آوری اطلاعات در بخش میدانی از پرسشنامه‎های بهزیستی روانشناختی ریف فرم کوتاه و ناسازگاری زناشویی اسپانیر (1976) استفاده شد. داده‎های پژوهش با نرم افزار آماری SPSS تجزیه و تحلیل شد.
نتایج: با توجه به بالاتر بودن میانگین نمرات گروه درمان ایماگوتراپی در پس آزمون، می‎توان نتیجه گرفت که نسبت به زوج درمانی هیجان مدار در افزایش بهزیستی روانشناختی زوجین ناسازگار و درگیر خیانت موثرتر بوده است.
نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان دادند که ‎بین میزان اثربخشی ایماگوتراپی بر بهزیستی روان شناختی زوجین ناسازگار و درگیرخیانت تفاوت وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the effectiveness of imagotherapy and emotion-focused couple therapy on couples' psychological well-being Incompatible and involved with your home

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jamileh Mansourian 1
  • Javad Khalatbari 2
  • Morteza Tarkhan 2
  • Shohre Ghorban Shirodi 2
  • Mohammadreza Zarbakhsh 3
1 PhD. Candidate of Psychology,Mazandaran University, Islamic Azad, Tonekabon, Iran.
2 PhD in Psychology,Associate professor of psychology, University of Mazandaran, Islamic Azad, Tonekabon, Iran
3 PhD in Psychology, Assistant professor of psychology, University of Mazandaran, Islamic Azad, Tonekabon, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of imagotherapy and emotion-focused couple therapy on the psychological well-being of maladaptive and involved couples.
Methods: The method of this study was applied in terms of purpose and in terms of implementation, experimental and in a pretest-posttest design with one control group and two experimental groups. The statistical population of the study consisted of all volunteer couples who responded to the call and were registered by the centers. 
The couple had been referred to a counseling center in Noushahr District 2 in the year 1396 because of their betrayal problems. Thirty-three eligible couples were then randomly assigned to three groups of imagotherapy (11 couples), emotion-focused therapy couples (11 couples) and control groups (11 couples). Sampling method was available. Data were collected by library and field methods. Spanier (1976) Short Form Reef Psychological Well-Being and Marital Incompatibility Questionnaires were used to collect information in the field. Data were analyzed using SPSS.
Results: Considering the higher mean scores of imagotherapy group in posttest, it can be concluded that betrayal was more effective than emotional couple therapy in increasing couples' psychological well-being.
Conclusion: The results showed that there is a difference between the effectiveness of imagotherapy on the psychological well-being of couples involved in infidelity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Imagotherapy
  • emotion-focused couple therapy
  • psychological well-being

مراجع

1.             Levy KN, Kelly KM, Jack EL. Sex differences in jealousy: A matter of evolution or attachment history? New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
2.             Omarzu J, Miller AN, Schultz C, Timmerman A. Motivations and emotional consequences related to engaging in extramarital relationships. International Journal of Sexual Health. 2012;24(2):154-62.
3.             Glass SP, Staeheli JC. Not" just friends": Protect your relationship from infidelity and heal the trauma of betrayal. New York: Free Press; 2002.
4.             Hawkins AJ, Willoughby BJ, Doherty WJ. Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2012;53(6):453-63.
5.             Jacquin KM. The effects of maladaptive schemata on information processing. Austin: The University of Texas; 1999.
6.             Glass SP, Wright TL. Reconstructing marriages after the trauma of infidelity. New York: Wiley; 1997.
7.             Brown EM. Patterns of infidelity and their treatment. London: Routledge; 2001.
8.             Buss DM, Shackelford TK. Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of research in personality. 1997;31(2):193-221.
9.             Baucom DH, Snyder DK, Gordon KC. Helping couples get past the affair: A clinician's guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
10.          Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1995;69(4):719.
11.          Peluso PR. Infidelity: A practitioner’s guide to working with couples in crisis. London: Routledge; 2007.
12.          Whisman MA, Dixon AE, Johnson B. Therapists' perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy. Journal of family psychology. 1997;11(3):361.
13.          Snyder DK, Baucom DH, Gordon KC. Getting past the affair: A program to help you cope, heal, and move on--Together or apart. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.
14.          Cockburn A, Brouwer L, Double MC, Margraf N, van de Pol M. Evolutionary origins and persistence of infidelity in Malurus: the least faithful birds. Emu. 2013;113(3):208-17.
15.          D.J. L. What is Imago Relationship therapy? New York: Imago Relationship Therapy; 2005.
16.          ETEMADI O, NAVABINEZHAD S, AHMADI SA, FARZAD VE. A STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COUPLE THERAPY BASED ON IMAGO RELATIONSHIP THERAPY ON MARITAL INTIMACY IN ESFAHAN. COUNSELING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. 2006;5:9-22.
17.          Sharpe DI, Walters AS, Goren MJ. Effect of cheating experience on attitudes toward infidelity. Sexuality & Culture. 2013;17:643-58.
18.          Donovan S, Emmers-Sommer TM. Attachment style and gender as predictors of communicative responses to infidelity. Marriage & Family Review. 2012;48(2):125-49.
19.          Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1976:15-28.
20.          Khanjani M, Shahidi S, Fathabadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff’s scale of Psychological well-being, short form (18-item) among male and female students. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2014;8(32):27-36.
21.          Hendrix H. Getting the love you want: A guide for couples. New York: St. Martin's Griffin; 2007.
22.          Lowe J, Riggenbach J. Welch: an American icon. New York: Wiley 2001.
23.          Zielinski JJ. Discovering imago relationship therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 1999;36(1):91.
24.          Holliman AJ, Hurry J, Bodman S. Children's reading profiles on exiting the Reading Recovery programme: do they predict sustained progress? Journal of Research in Reading. 2016;39(1):1-18.
25.          Reis HT, Clark MS, Holmes JG. Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness.  Handbook of closeness and intimacy: Psychology Press; 2004. p. 211-36.
26.          Hedari K. Comparison of the effectiveness of Imagotherapy and Satir Couple Therapy on the Sustainability of Conflict Couples in Shiraz. Shiraz: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; 2016.
27.          Sadrjahani S. The effectiveness of communication imaging training on relationship patterns in marital intimacy of addicts and their spouses. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i University; 2010.
28.          Martin TL, Bielawski DM. What Is the African American’s Experience Following Imago Education? Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2011;51(2):216-28.
29.          Khalili J. The effect of imagotherapy techniques on couples' intimacy, affection and love styles.  4th International Conference on Recent Innovations in Psychology, Counseling and Behavioral Sciences; Tehran2017.
30.          Hendrix H, Hannah MT, Luquet W, Hunt HL, Mason RC. Imago relationship therapy: Perspectives on theory: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub; 2005.
31.          De Clercq D, Rius IB. Organizational commitment in Mexican small and medium‐sized firms: the role of work status, organizational climate, and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of small business management. 2007;45(4):467-90.
32.          Sadra A, Elmira Ezazi B, Mona Honarmand D, Sahar M, Zahra D. Effectiveness of Imago Therapy Training on Perspective Taking and Forgiveness in Females Damaged by Marital Infidelity. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2018;6(6):46-52.
33.          Fatehizadeh M, Naghavi A, Soltani M. Prevalence of work-family and family-work conflict and its relationship with marital and job satisfaction variables among women. Career and organizational consulting. 2010;3:79-100.
34.          Sodani M, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M, Soltani Z. The effectiveness of transactional analysis training on family function of maladjusted couples. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2012;2(3):268-87.
35.          Vian A. The effectiveness of emotional couple therapy on emotional regulation and psychological well-being in Tehran infertile women. Tehran: Payame Noor University; 2014.
36.          Zeraei F, Mosavi R. Efficacy of emotion-focused couple therapy on the change of adult attachment styles and sexual intimacy of couples. Counsel Cult  Psycother. 2016;7:71-90.
37.          Saadati A, Nejat H. The effectiveness of emotional couple therapy on subjective well-being. International Conference on New Research Findings in Science, Engineering and Technology with Need-Based Research Tehran, Iran2015.
38.          Yousefzadeh P, Farzad V, Navabinejad S, Noranipoor R. Comparison of effectiveness of integrative behavioral couple therapy and behavioral systems couple therapy in increasing mental health of couples. Ebnesina. 2017;19:22-8.
39.          Michaeli Manee F. The study of ryff psychological well-being scale factorial structure between Urmia university students. J Psychol. 2010;5:143-65.
 
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 61، شماره 6.1
ویژه نامه روانشناسی
بهمن و اسفند 1397
صفحه 182-192

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار