مدلی برای پیش‌بینی طلاق عاطفی بر مبنای سواد عاطفی، سبک‌های مقابله‌ای، کیفیت زندگی و هیجان خواهی با میانجی‌گری تنظیم هیجان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد رودهن، رودهن، ایران

3 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، کرج، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدلی برای پیش­بینی طلاق عاطفی بر مبنای سواد عاطفی، سبک‌های مقابله‌ای، کیفیت زندگی و هیجان خواهی با میانجی‌گری تنظیم هیجان بود.
روش کار: روش این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی با رویکرد مدل ساختاری بود. از جامعه زنان متأهل شاغل در مدارس ابتدایی دولتی شهر تهران با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی چند مرحله‎ای 350 نفر انتخاب شدند. به منظور جمع آوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه طلاق عاطفی گاتمن، کیفیت زندگی واروشریون، سبک‌های مقابله‌ای لازاروس – فولکمن، هیجان خواهی زاکرمن، کارکردهای روانشناختی خانواده ایرانی کیمیایی و پرسشنامه دشواری تنظیم هیجان گراتز مورد استفاده قرار گرفت.
نتایج: آزمون رگرسیون نشان داد که سواد عاطفی و کیفیت زندگی تاثیر منفی بر طلاق عاطفی دارند. هیجان خواهی، تنظیم هیجان و سبک گریز اجتناب تاثیر مثبت بر طلاق عاطفی دارند. سواد عاطفی با 37/0- بیشترین تاثیر را بر طلاق عاطفی دارد. ضرایب تاثیر غیر مستقیم با واسطه گری تنظیم هیجان نشان می‌دهد دوری گزینی و گریز-اجتناب تاثیر مثبتی بر طلاق عاطفی دارد. رویارویی، حمایت اجتماعی، کیفیت زندگی و مسئولیت پذیری دارای ضرایب تاثیر غیرمستقیم منفی هستند که به معنای تاثیر منفی آن‎ها بر طلاق عاطفی با میانجیگری تنظیم هیجان است. دو متغیر گریز-اجتناب و کیفیت زندگی به هر دو شکل مستقیم وغیر مستقیم بر طلاق عاطفی اثر دارند.
نتیجه گیری: بین سواد عاطفی، سبک‌های مقابله‌ای، کیفیت زندگی و هیجان خواهی با طلاق عاطفی ارتباط وجود دارد که تنظیم هیجان می­تواند این ارتباط را میانجی­گری بکند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Model for Predicting Emotional Divorce Based on Emotional Literacy, Coping Styles, Quality of Life, and Emotion Seeking with Emotion Regulation Mediation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila Alaghband 1
  • HasanPasha Sharifi 2
  • Valiollah Farzad 3
  • Alireza Aghayousefi 4
1 PhD Student of Counseling, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Roudehen, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Psychology, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran.
4 Associate Professor of Psychology, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to present a model for predicting emotional divorce based on emotional literacy, coping styles, quality of life, and emotion-seeking through mediating emotion regulation.
Methods: The purpose of this study was descriptive-correlational in terms of purpose and structural model approach. A total of 350 women were selected from the community of married women employed in public primary schools in Tehran. Data were collected using Gutman's Emotional Divorce Questionnaire, Varouchrion's Quality of Life, Lazarus-Folkman Coping Styles, Zuckerman's Emotionalism Questionnaire, Iranian-Iranian Chemical Family Functioning Questionnaire, and Graz's Emotion Regulation Difficulty Questionnaire.
Results: Regression tests showed that emotional literacy and quality of life had a negative effect on emotional divorce. Emotional seeking, emotion regulation, and avoidance style have a positive impact on emotional divorce. Emotional literacy with -0.37 has the greatest impact on emotional divorce. Indirect effect coefficients mediated by emotion regulation show that avoidance and avoidance-avoidance have a positive effect on emotional divorce. Confrontation, social support, quality of life, and responsibility have indirect negative impact coefficients, which means that they have a negative impact on emotional divorce mediated by emotion regulation. The two variables of avoidance-avoidance and quality of life have both direct and indirect effects on emotional divorce.
Conclusion: There is a relationship between emotional literacy, coping styles, quality of life, and emotion-seeking with emotional divorce that can mediate this relationship.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Emotional divorce
  • Emotional literacy
  • coping styles
  • Quality of life
  • Emotion seeking
  • Emotion regulation
  1. Girgis S, George RP, Anderson RT. What is marriage. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y. 2011; 34:245.
    2. Rasta M, Abedzadeh M. Investigating the Factors Affecting Emotional Divorce Among Couples in the Family.
    Iranian Journal of Sociological Studies. 3(10): 31-46.
    3. Skafi M, Turkmen F. Assessment and Typology of Emotional Divorce in Mashhad. Journal of Women
    Research, 2015; 6 (14): 19-36.
    4. Berghoff CR, Gratz KL, Portz KJ, Pinkston M, Naifeh JA, Evans SD, Konkle-Parker DJ, Tull MT. The Role
    of Emotional Avoidance, the Patient–Provider Relationship, and Other Social Support in ART Adherence for
    HIV+ Individuals. AIDS and Behavior. 2018 Mar 1;22(3):929-38.
    5. Azadi sh, Sahami S, Ghahramani Z, Gholipour Gh. Evaluation of Social Factors Predicting Emotional Divorce
    Among Female Employees of Gachsaran Oil Company. Journal of Women and Health. 2012; 1 (3): 7-18.
    6. DeFrain, J., & Asay, S. M. (2007). Family strengths and challenges in the USA. Marriage & Family
    Review, 41(3-4), 281-307.
    7. Hashemi L, Homayuni H. Emotional Divorce: Child’s Well-Being. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2017
    Nov 17;58(8):631-44.
    8. Ahmadvand M, Ahmadvand M, Babaei Z. Decreased quality of life and marital trust in emotional divorce.
    Eighth Conference of Psychology and Social Sciences. 2017: University of Tehran
    9. Samadifar H. The relationship between emotional temperaments and emotional divorce with quality of life of
    couples. Second International Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences and Lifestyle. 2015: Tehran
    10. Litzinger S, Gordon KC. Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital
    satisfaction. Journal of sex & marital therapy. 2005 Oct 1;31(5):409-24.
    11. Kraemer BR, McIntyre LL, Blacher J. Quality of life for young adults with mental retardation during
    transition. Mental retardation. 2003 Aug;41(4):250-62.
    12. Castanheira MF, Conceição LE, Millot S, Rey S, Bégout ML, DamsgAard B, Kristiansen T, Höglund E, Øverli
    Ø, Martins CI. Coping styles in farmed fish: consequences for aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2017
    Mar;9(1):23-41.
  2.  13. Tavakolizadeh J, Soltani A, Panahi M. Marital adjustment: The predictive role of spiritual intelegence and
    coping strategeis . Horizon Med Sci. 2014; 19 (5) :57-63
    14. Kajbaf M, Neshatdoust H, Khalouei Gh. Investigating the Relationship between Sensation Seeking and Marital
    Satisfaction. Journal of Shahed University. 2006: 1 (3): 42-56.
    15. Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM. Personality and risk‐ taking: common bisocial factors. Journal of personality.
    2000 Dec;68(6):999-1029.
    16. Griesinger G, Berndt H, Schultz L, Depenbusch M, Schultze-Mosgau A. Cumulative live birth rates after
    GnRH-agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of OHSS: a prospective, clinical cohort
    study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2010 Apr 1;149(2):190-4.
    17. Lyusin DB. Emotional intelligence as a mixed construct: Its relation to personality and gender. Journal of
    Russian & East European Psychology. 2006 Dec 1;44(6):54-68.
    18. Bastani S, Golzari M, Roshani sh. The Consequences of Emotional Divorce and Coping Strategies. Journal of
    Family Research. 2012; 7 (26): 241-257.
    19. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological
    Assessment. 2007 Jan;23(3):141-9.
    20. Gottman JM, Levenson RW. The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14‐ year
    period. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2000 Aug;62(3):737-45.
    21. Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann Jr WB. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of
    Research in personality. 2003 Dec 1;37(6):504-28.
    22. Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of general psychology.
    1998 Sep;2(3):271-99.
    23. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A metaanalytic review. Clinical psychology review. 2010 Mar 1;30(2):217-37.
    24. Firouzjaei Ali Asghar, Riahi Mohammad Esmaeel, Mohammadi Dost Mansoura. Sociological Analysis of
    Emotional Divorce Among Couples in Noshahr. Social-Cultural Development Studies. 2016; 5 (3): 34-59.
    25. Mosavi SF, RezaZadeh SMR. Investigation the role of love attitude in predicting of emotional divorce among
    married men and women in Qazvin city. J Women Soc Psycho Stud. 2014; 12(3): 169- 188
    26. Ahmadloo M, Zeinali A. Predicting of emotional divorce based on novelty seeking, negative perfectionism and
    insecure attachment among employed women of Urmia city. ioh. 2018; 15 (2) :64-72
    27. Mohammadi E. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Marital Satisfaction,
    Psychological Flexibility, and Quality of Life in Depressed Women with Marital Conflicts. 2016; Master’s
    Thesis
    28. Zarei S, Asadi Z. The Comparison of Personality Characteristics and Coping Styles in Addicted and NonAddicted Adolescents. Addiction research. 2012; 5 (20): 87-104.
    29. Zuckerman M, Kolin EA, Price L, Zoob I. Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of consulting
    psychology. 1964 Dec;28(6):477.
    30. Zuckerman M, Eysenck SB, Eysenck HJ. Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and
    sex comparisons. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 1978 Feb;46(1):139.
    31. Kimiaee SA, Khademia H, Farhad H, Ghimati A. Develop and Study of Preliminary Psychometric and
    Validation Characteristic of Iranian Family Psychological Function Scale. Journal of Modern Psychological
    Research. 2012; 7 (27): 146- 182.
    32. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development,
    factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of
    psychopathology and behavioral assessment. 2004 Mar 1;26(1):41-54.
    33. West SG. Finch, JF, & Curran, PJ (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. Problems and
    remedies. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. 1995:56-75.
    34. Taris TW. BM Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and
    programming Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001 0-8058-3322-6. European Journal of Work and
    Organizational Psychology. 2002; 11:243-6.
    35. RasouliTabar M, Jaberi A. The Relationship between Emotional Literacy and Conflict Resolution with
    Emotional Divorce in Kermanshah Couples. Journal of Psychological and Educational Studies. 2017; 25 (10):
    135-148.
    36. Hashemi S, Asghari Ebrahim Abad M. The Role of Emotional Literacy in Predicting Emotional Divorce by
    Mediating Conflict Resolution. Journal of Education, Counseling and Psychotherapy, 2016; 5 (17): 59-72.
    37. Soleimani I, Sheikholeslami A, Mousavi M. The Effectiveness of Emotional Intelligence on Social Adequacy
    and Emotional Regulation of Bullying Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016; 12 (42): 103-128.
    38. Moradian sh. Investigating the Relationship between Quality of Life, Marital Satisfaction, Marriage Age and
    Premarital Sexual Relationship with Emotional Divorce in Ilam. Masters Thesis. 2016, Iran.
    39. MirAsadi F. A Comparative Study of the Cognitive Triangle and Quality of Life among the Three Divorced,
    Married, and Divorced Groups. Masters Thesis. 2016, Iran.
  3. 40. Rezaei AM, Mirzadeh F, Yagoubi E. Couples' Emotional Interactions and Their Role in Emotional Divorce
    and Divorce: A Qualitative Research. 2017; 13 (4): 585-604.
    41. Gheymati R. Predicting Quality of Life through Sensation-seeking and Sexual Satisfaction among Married
    Men and Women. Masters Thesis. 2012, Iran
    42. SeyfZadeh M. The Relationship between Sexual Self-Efficacy, Attachment Styles, and Emotional Seeking
    with Marital Satisfaction in Adaptive and Incompatible Couples. Masters Thesis. 2017, Iran
    43. Rahimi A. The Relationship between Emotion-seeking and Mental Health with Marital Satisfaction of Married
    Students of Payam-e-Noor University of Tehran. Masters Thesis. 2011, Iran
    44. Dafei M. The Investigation of Relation between Coping Strategies with Individual Characteristics and Mental
    Health of Unfertilized Couples of Yazd. [MSc Thesis]. Tehran,Iran: School of Medicine, 2005; Tarbiat
    Modares University
    45. Kamp Dush CM, Taylor MG, Kroeger RA. Marital happiness and psychological well‐ being across the life
    course. Family relations. 2008 Apr;57(2):211-26.
    46. Lawrence EM, Rogers RG, Zajacova A, Wadsworth T. Marital happiness, marital status, health, and longevity.
    Journal of Happiness Studies. 2019 Jun 15;20(5):1539-61.
    47. Omidifar H, Pourebrahim T, KhoshKonesh A, Moradi A. Comparison and Relationship between SelfRegulatory, Emotional, and Marital Intimacy in Couples of One and One Government Employees. Journal of
    Business and Organizational Counseling. 2017; 8(26): 50-67.