تاثیر برنامه چند مدلی مدیریت درد بر درد ذهنی، فاجعه سازی درد در زنان و مردان مبتلا به سندرم کرونری حاد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روانشاسی بالینی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رودهن

2 دانشیار، عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رودهن

چکیده

خلاصه
مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر برنامه چند مدلی مدیریت  درد بر درد ذهنی، فاجعه سازی درد در زنان و مردان مبتلا به سندرم کرونری حاد در سال 1398 بود.
روش کار: روش پژوهش حاضر از نظر شیوه جزء طرح­های نیمه آزمایشی با پیش­ آزمون و پس ­آزمون با گروه کنترل است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش متشکل از همه بیماران زن و مرد بیمارستان رجایی قلب تهران در سال 1398 – 99 که در نوار قلبی خصوصیات سندرم کرونری حاد را داشته و تشخیص به تایید پزشک متخصص رسیده اند؛ بود. برای دستیابی به گروه نمونه به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس با افرادی که تمایل به شرکت در پژوهش داشتند انتخاب شدند و با توجه به جدول کوهن  و میزان خطای 1 درصد 30 نفر به‌صورت تصادفی در دو گروه 15 نفری، آزمایشی و گروه کنترل قرار گرفتند. در این مرحله پرسشنامه­های درد ذهنی و فاجعه سازی درد به عنوان پیش آزمون از هردو گروه آزمایش و کنترل گرفته شد، سپس گروه آزمایش 8 جلسه برنامه چند مدلی مدیرت درد را دریافت کردند، پس از پایان 8 جلسه، از هردوگروه پس آزمون گرفته شد. برای تحلیل داده­ها از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس استفاده گردید.
نتایج: داده­ها حاکی از تفاوت معنادار گروه آزمایش و کنترل در مقیاس درد ذهنی و فاجعه سازی درد بود.
نتیجه گیری: نتایج پژوهش تاثیر برنامه چند مدلی مدیریت درد را به عنوان یکی از روش­های حمایتی در کاهش درد ذهنی و فاجعه سازی درد در بیماران مبتلا به سندرم کرونری حاد نشان داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Multimodal Pain Management Program on Subjective Pain, Pain Catastrophizing in Women and Men with Acute Coronary Syndrome

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahar Sadeghian 1
  • Hossein EbrahimiMoghaddam 2
1 Master of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch
2 Associate Professor, Faculty Member of Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of multi-model pain management program on subjective pain, pain catastrophizing in men and women with acute coronary syndrome in 1398.
Methods: The method of the present study is a semi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test with control group. The statistical population of this study consists of all male and female patients of Rajai Heart Hospital in Tehran in 1398-99 who had the characteristics of acute coronary syndrome in the ECG and were diagnosed by a specialist; to achieve the sample group by available sampling method with people who wanted to participate in the study were selected and according to Cohen's table and the error rate of 1%, 30 people were randomly divided into two groups of 15 people, experimental and control group. At this stage, subjective pain and pain catastrophe questionnaires were taken as a pre-test from both experimental and control groups, then the experimental group received 8 sessions of multi-model pain management program, after 8 sessions, post-test was taken from both groups. Analysis of covariance was used by SPSS-24.
Results: The data showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the scale of mental pain and catastrophic pain.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed the effect of a multimodal pain management program as one of the supportive methods in reducing subjective pain and catastrophic pain in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pain Management
  • Subjective Pain
  • Catastrophizing
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome

مراجع

  1. Thygesen K, Mair J, Giannitsis E, Mueller C, Lindahl B, Blankenberg S, Huber K, Plebani M, Biasucci LM, Tubaro M, Collinson P. How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care. European heart journal. 2012 Sep 1;33(18):2252-7.
  2. Scirica BM. Acute coronary syndrome: emerging tools for diagnosis and risk assessment. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):1403-15.
  3. Chen W, Woods SL, Puntillo KA. Gender differences in symptoms associated with acute myocardial infarction: a review of the research. Heart & Lung. 2005 Jul 1;34(4):240-7.
  4. Graham MM, Westerhout CM, Kaul P, Norris CM, Armstrong PW. Sex differences in patients seeking medical attention for prodromal symptoms before an acute coronary event. American heart journal. 2008 Dec 1;156(6):1210-6.
  5. Rittger H, Hochadel M, Behrens S, Hauptmann KE, Zahn R, Mudra H, Brachmann J, Senges J, Zeymer U. Age-related differences in diagnosis, treatment and outcome of acute coronary syndromes: results from the German ALKK registry. EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2012 Feb;7(10):1197.
  6. Patel H, Rosengren A, Ekman I. Symptoms in acute coronary syndromes: does sex make a difference?. American heart journal. 2004 Jul 1;148(1):27-33.
  7. Antoniadis AP, Mortier P, Kassab G, Dubini G, Foin N, Murasato Y, Giannopoulos AA, Tu S, Iwasaki K, Hikichi Y, Migliavacca F. Biomechanical Modeling to Improve Coronary Artery Bifurcation Stenting: Expert Review Document on Techniques and Clinical Implementation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 1281-96. antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213-60.
  8. Takakuwa KM, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. The influence of race and gender on time to initial electrocardiogram for patients with chest pain. Academic emergency medicine. 2006 Aug;13(8):867-72.
  9. Boccardi L, Verde M. Gender differences in the clinical presentation to the emergency department for chest pain. Italian Heart Journal. 2003 Jun;4:371-3.
  10. Sheifer SE, Escarce JJ, Schulman KA. Race and sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. American heart journal. 2000 May 1;139(5):848-57.
  11. Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R. Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The Lancet Neurology. 2011 Jan 1;10(1):63-74.
  12. Moser DK, Robinson S, Biddle MJ, Pelter MM, Nesbitt TS, Southard J, Cooper L, Dracup K. Health literacy predicts morbidity and mortality in rural patients with heart failure. Journal of cardiac failure. 2015 Aug 1;21(8):612-8.
  13. Boster A, Hreha S, Berger JR, Bao F, Penmesta R, Tselis A, Endress C, Zak I, Perumal J, Caon C, Vazquez J. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Archives of Neurology. 2009 May 11;66(5):593-9.
  14. Yarnitsky D, Granot M, Granovsky Y. Pain modulation profile and pain therapy: between pro-and antinociception. Pain. 2014 Apr 1;155(4):663-5.
  15. Bradshaw CP, Mitchell MM, Leaf PJ. Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2010 Jul;12(3):133-48.
  16. Herlitz J, Ekström L, Wennerblom B, Axelsson Å, Bång A, Holmberg S. Adrenaline in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Does it make any difference?. Resuscitation. 1995 Jun 1;29(3):195-201.
  17. Norris PR, Stein PK, Morris Jr JA. Reduced heart rate multiscale entropy predicts death in critical illness: a study of physiologic complexity in 285 trauma patients. Journal of critical care. 2008 Sep 1;23(3):399-405.
  18. Milner KA, Funk M, Richards S, Wilmes RM, Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM. Gender differences in symptom presentation associated with coronary heart disease. The American journal of cardiology. 1999 Aug 15;84(4):396-9.
  19. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Szklo‐Coxe M, Tisminetzky M, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM, Gaasch W. Symptom presentation in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. Clinical cardiology. 2010 Jun;33(6):E73-80.
  20. Goldberg RJ, Goldberg JH, Pruell S, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Spencer FA, Gore JM. Delays in seeking medical care in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure. The American journal of medicine. 2008 Mar 1;121(3):212-8.
  21. Apelqvist J, Larsson J, Agardh CD. The importance of peripheral pulses, peripheral oedema and local pain for the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic medicine. 1990 Aug;7(7):590-4.
  22. Kemp KA, Sheps DM, Luciak-Corea C, Styles-Tripp F, Buckingham J, Beaupre LA. Systematic review of rotator cuff tears in workers’ compensation patients. Occupational Medicine. 2011 Dec 1;61(8):556-62.
  23. Keefe RS, Silva SG, Perkins DO, Lieberman JA. The effects of atypical antipsychotic drugs on neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia bulletin. 1999 Jan 1;25(2):201-22.
  24. Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ. Pain management: practical applications of the biopsychosocial perspective in clinical and occupational settings. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007 Oct 30.
  25. Flor H, Turk DC, Birbaumer N. Assessment of stress-related psychophysiological reactions in chronic back pain patients. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 1985 Jun;53(3):354.
  26. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain. 1999 Mar 1;80(1-2):1-3.
  27. Guzmán J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. Bmj. 2001 Jun 23;322(7301):1511-6.
  28. Saedi S, Hatami M, Asgari P, Ahadi H, Poursharifi H. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on alexithymia and pain self-efficacy of patients with chronic pain. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2016;5(11):277-84.
  29. Mousavi M, Mujembari AK, Hassani Abharian P, Pashang S. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on quality of life of women with chronic low back pain. Pajoohandeh Journal. 2018 Jan 10;23(1):0-.
  30. Jurth C, Rehberg B, von Dincklage F. Reliability of subjective pain ratings and nociceptive flexion reflex responses as measures of conditioned pain modulation. Pain Research and Management. 2014 Mar 1;19.
  31. Fadayevatan R, Alizadeh-Khoei M, Hessami-Azar ST, Sharifi F, Haghi M, Kaboudi B. Validity and reliability of 11-face faces pain scale in the Iranian elderly community with chronic pain. Indian journal of palliative care. 2019 Jan;25(1):46.
  32. Miró J, Nieto R, Huguet A. The Catalan version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: a useful instrument to assess catastrophic thinking in whiplash patients. The Journal of Pain. 2008 May 1;9(5):397-406.
  33. Raeissadat SA, Sadeghi S, Montazeri A. Validation of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) in Iran. J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2013;3(9):376-80.
  34. Young J, Matthews R, editors. Rethinking criminology: The realist debate. London: Sage; 1992.
  35. Sebro B, Dubravica M. Spontaneous use of active and passive coping strategies for pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatizam. 1993;40(1):1-4.
  36. Parker I, editor. Deconstructing psychotherapy. Sage; 1999 May 17.
  37. Leibing E, Pfingsten M, Bartmann U, Rueger U, Schuessler G. Cognitive-behavioral treatment in unselected rheumatoid arthritis outpatients. The Clinical journal of pain. 1999 Mar 1;15(1):58-66.
  38. McCracken JT, McGough J, Shah B, Cronin P, Hong D, Aman MG, Arnold LE, Lindsay R, Nash P, Hollway J, McDougle CJ. Risperidone in children with autism and serious behavioral problems. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002 Aug 1;347(5):314-21.
  39. Tatrow K, Montgomery GH. Cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for distress and pain in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Journal of behavioral medicine. 2006 Feb 1;29(1):17-27.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 62، شماره 3
مرداد-شهریور98- شماره3- دوره62
مرداد و شهریور 1398
صفحه 1588-1596

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار