طراحی ابزار سنجش ویژگی های روان شناختی پرستاران و تیم فوریت های پزشکی در سوانح و حوادث

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه روانشناسی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه روانشناسی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

3 گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیارگروه روان‌شناسی بالینی تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: زمانیکه حادثه‌ای در کشور ایران اتفاق می‌افتد گروه‌های جهادی اولین افرادی هستند که برای نجات و کمک به حادثه دیده‌ها اعزام می‌شوند. موفقیت تیم اعزام بسته به انتخاب فرد مناسب برای موقعیت عادی و اضطراری است. برهمین اساس مطالعه حاضر با هدف طراحی ابزاری برای سنجش ویژگی‌های روانشناختی پرستاران و تیم فوریت‌های پزشکی به عنوان اولین پاسخگویان در سوانح و بلایا انجام شده است.
روش کار: پژوهش حاضر یک مطالعه ترکیبی متوالی اکتشافی از نوع طراحی ابزار بود که در دو بخش کیفی و کمّی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی با مصاحبه‌های فردی و بررسی ادبیات برای تولید مواد و سپس براساس نتایج این بخش استخراج گویه‌ها تشکیل شد و ارزیابی‌های روان‌سنجی برای اعتبار، صوری محتوا و سازه انجام شد.
نتایج: عامل اکتشافی برای طراحی این پرسشنامه 41 سوالی با 8 عامل استفاده شد. این 8 عامل عبارتند از؛ برون‌گرایی، وظیفه-شناسی، هوش‌هیجانی، روان‌آزرده‌گرایی، تحمل‌پریشانی، موافق‌بودن، بازبودن به تجربه و بدبینی.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان داد که پرسشنامه سنجش ویژگی‌های روانشناختی گروه های جهادی در سوانح و بلایا ابزاری قابل قبول می‌باشد که تمام ابعاد ویژگی‌های روان‌شناختی گروه های جهادی در سوانح و حوادث را پوشش داده است. این پرسشنامه به شکل قابل اعتمادی می‌تواند در تحقیقات مرتبط بکار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a tool to assess the psychological characteristics of nurses and emergency medical teams in accidents

نویسندگان [English]

  • Soudabeh Gharibi 1
  • HasanPasha sharifi 2
  • HamidReza khankeh 3
  • Sozan Emamipour 4
1 Department of Psychology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Psychology, Roudhen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudhen, Iran
3 Department of Psychology, University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: When an accident occurs, rescue teams are the first to be sent to rescue and help the victims. The success of the deployment team depends on choosing the right person for the normal and emergency situation. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the psychological characteristics of the first respondents in accidents and disasters.
Methods: The present study was a sequential combined exploratory study of instrument design that was conducted in two parts: qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative section, individual interviews and literature reviews for the production of materials and then based on the results of this section, a pool of items were formed and psychometric assessments were performed for validity, formality of content and structure.
Results: Exploratory factor 41 questions with 8 factors were used to design this questionnaire. These 8 factors are; Extraversion, conscientiousness, emotional intelligence, neuroticism, distress tolerance, agreeableness, openness to experience, and pessimism.
Discussion and Conclusion: The results showed that the questionnaire for assessing the psychological characteristics of helpers in disasters is an acceptable tool that covers all aspects of the psychological characteristics of first respondent in accidents and disasters. This questionnaire can be reliably used in related research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nurse
  • Medical Emergency
  • Accidents
  • Psychological Characteristics
  • Tool Design

مراجع

  1. khankeh HR, et.al. Disaster Hospital Planing:National Plan. Third ed: University of Social Wellfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2017.
  2. Thomas DS, Phillips BD, Lovekamp WE, Fothergill A. Social Vulnerability to Disasters, Second Edition. New York: CRC Press; 2014.p.138-514 2.
  3. Moreira LL, de Brito MM, Kobiyama M. Effects of different normalization, aggregation, and classification methods on the construction of flood vulnerability indexes. Water. 2021 Jan;13(1):98.
  4. Herbert A, Gilbert R, Cottrell D, Li L. Causes of death up to 10 years after admissions to hospitals for self-inflicted, drug-related or alcohol-related, or violent injury during adolescence: a retrospective, nationwide, cohort study. The Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):577-87.
  5. Lim J. Post-disaster Applications for Displaced Populations. InOil Rig and Superbarge Floating Settlements 2021 (pp. 105-138). Springer, Singapore.
  6. Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R. Annual disaster statistical review 2116. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. 2016. P.19 3.
  7. Arefian, F. F., & Moeini, S. H. I. Urban Change in Iran. Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer.
  8. Roudini J, Khankeh HR, Witruk E, Ebadi A, Reschke K, Stück M. Community mental health preparedness in disasters: a qualitative content analysis in an Iranian context. Health in Emergencies and Disasters. 2017 Jul 10;2(4):165-78.
  9. Mao X, Fung OW, Hu X, Loke AY. Psychological impacts of disaster on rescue workers: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2018 Mar 1;27:602-17.
  10. Sifaki-Pistolla D, Chatzea VE, Vlachaki SA, Melidoniotis E, Pistolla G. Who is going to rescue the rescuers? Post-traumatic stress disorder among rescue workers operating in Greece during the European refugee crisis. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2017 Jan 1;52(1):45-54.
  11. Bakker AB, de Vries JD. Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2021 Jan 2;34(1):1-21.
  12. Bell ST. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology. 2007 May;92(3):595.
  13. Cabarkapa S, Nadjidai SE, Murgier J, Ng CH. The psychological impact of COVID-19 and other viral epidemics on frontline healthcare workers and ways to address it: A rapid systematic review. Brain, behavior, & immunity-health. 2020 Sep 17:100144.
  14. Hughes MM, Groenewold MR, Lessem SE, Xu K, Ussery EN, Wiegand RE, Qin X, Do T, Thomas D, Tsai S, Davidson A. Update: characteristics of health care personnel with COVID-19—United States, February 12–July 16, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020 Sep 25;69(38):1364.
  15. Littleton-Kearney MT, Slepski LA. Directions for disaster nursing education in the United States. Critical care nursing clinics of North America. 2008 Mar 1;20(1):103-9.
  16. Brackbill RM, Cone JE, Farfel MR, Stellman SD. Chronic physical health consequences of being injured during the terrorist attacks on World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. American journal of epidemiology. 2014 May 1;179(9):1076-85.
  17. Hamdan-Mansour AM, Puskar K, Bandak AG. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on depressive symptomatology, stress and coping strategies among Jordanian university students. Issues in mental health nursing. 2009 Jan 1;30(3):188-96.
  18. Eriksson CB, Foy DW, Larson LC. When the helpers need help: Early intervention for emergency and relief services personnel. Early intervention for trauma and traumatic loss. 2004:241-62.
  19. Strohmeier H, Scholte WF. Trauma-related mental health problems among national humanitarian staff: A systematic review of the literature. European journal of psychotraumatology. 2015 Dec 1;6(1):28541.
  20. Wu W, Zhang Y, Wang P, Zhang L, Wang G, Lei G, Xiao Q, Cao X, Bian Y, Xie S, Huang F. Psychological stress of medical staffs during outbreak of COVID‐19 and adjustment strategy. Journal of medical virology. 2020 Oct;92(10):1962-70.
  21. Wang J, Cheng Y, Zhou Z, Jiang A, Guo J, Chen Z, Wan Q. Psychological status of Wuhan medical staff in fighting against COVID-19. Med. J. Wuhan Univ.. 2020:547-50.
  22. Jang I, Kim JS, Lee J, Seo Y. Educational needs and disaster response readiness: A cross‐sectional study of clinical nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2021 Jan;77(1):189-97.
  23. Liao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Deng X, Yang L. The mental health and correlated factors of medical team members in an aerospace medical unit before conducting non-war military operations. InInternational Conference on Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering 2020 Oct 24 (pp. 179-185). Springer, Singapore.
  24. Babar M, Tahir M. The effects of big five personality traits on employee job performance among university lecturers in Peshawar city. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. 2020 Jun 21;2(1):43-50.
  25. Folk D, Okabe-Miyamoto K, Dunn E, Lyubomirsky S, Donnellan B. Did social connection decline during the first wave of COVID-19?: the role of extraversion. Collabra: Psychology. 2020 Jan 1;6(1).
  26. Klein KJ, Ziegert JC, Knight AP, Xiao Y. Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative science quarterly. 2006 Dec;51(4):590-621.
  27. Do MH, Minbashian A. A meta-analytic examination of the effects of the agentic and affiliative aspects of extraversion on leadership outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly. 2014 Oct 1;25(5):1040-53.
  28. Boyce CJ, Wood AM, Brown GD. The dark side of conscientiousness: Conscientious people experience greater drops in life satisfaction following unemployment. Journal of Research in Personality. 2010 Aug 1;44(4):535-9.
  29. Pendleton D, Furnham A. The impact of personality on leadership. InLeadership: All You Need To Know 2012 (pp. 135-154). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  30. MacCann C, Jiang Y, Brown LE, Double KS, Bucich M, Minbashian A. Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2020 Feb;146(2):150.
  31. Martin-Raugh MP, Kell HJ, Motowidlo SJ. Prosocial knowledge mediates effects of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016 Feb 1;90:41-9.
  32. Ceobanu MC, Mairean C. The relation between personality traits, social support and traumatic stress. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 2015 Mar 1;48:17.
  33. Gardner DM, Lauricella T, Ryan AM, Wadlington P, Elizondo F. Managing boundaries between work and non‐work domains: Personality and job characteristics and adopted style. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2021 Mar;94(1):132-59.
  34. Chowdhury N, Kevorkian S, Hawn SE, Amstadter AB, Dick D, Kendler KS, Berenz EC. Associations between personality and distress tolerance among trauma-exposed young adults. Personality and individual differences. 2018 Jan 1;120:166-70.
  35. Tull M, Kimbrel N, editors. Emotion in posttraumatic stress disorder: etiology, assessment, neurobiology, and treatment. Academic Press; 2020 Jan 31.
  36. Lee ST, Park G. Does diversity in team members’ agreeableness benefit creative teams?. Journal of Research in Personality. 2020 Apr 1;85:103932.
  37. Saad G. Evolutionary consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2013 Jul;23(3):351-71.
  38. Minbashian, A., Earl, J., & Bright, J. E. Openness to experience as a predictor of job performance trajectories. Applied Psychology, 2013: 62(1), 1-12.
  39. Chopik WJ, Oh J, Kim ES, Schwaba T, Krämer MD, Richter D, Smith J. Changes in optimism and pessimism in response to life events: Evidence from three large panel studies. Journal of Research in Personality. 2020 Oct 1;88:103985.
  40. Cnen TW, Chiu YC, Hsu Y. Perception of social support provided by coaches, optimism/pessimism, and psychological well-being: Gender differences and mediating effect models. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2021 Apr;16(2):272-80.
  41. Mowanes K, Abu Kwaik B. Optimism, pessimism and their relation to self-esteem among Palestinian Authority employees referred to retirement in Gaza Strip-Palestine. An-Najah University Journal for Research-B (Humanities). 2020;34(2):4.
  42. Rozanski A. Assessment and Management of Psychosocial Risk Factors Within Preventive Cardiology Practice. InASPC Manual of Preventive Cardiology 2021 (pp. 61-72). Springer, Cham.
  43. da Silveira JJ, Lima GT. Can workers’ increased pessimism about the labor market conditions raise unemployment?. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2021 Mar 1;72:125-34.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 64، شماره 6 - شماره پیاپی 6
بهمن و اسفند 1400
صفحه 4361-4380

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار