پایایی مجموعه آزمون سنجش حرکت کودکان- ویرایش دوم (MABC-2) در کودکان اوتیسم 3 تا 16 ساله شهر تهران

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رفتار حرکتی-رشد حرکتی گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایر

2 استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه الزهرا(س)، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: اوتیسم به عنوان یک اختلال رشدی همواره کودکان را با مشکلاتی در زندگی روزمره همراه می سازد و پیوسته او را به‌سوی انزوا و دوری از جامعه سوق می‌دهد و یافتن ابزاری پایا برای این اختلال به عنوان یک نیاز است. هدف از این تحقیق تعیین پایایی مجموعه آزمون سنجش حرکتی کودکان-ویرایش دوم برای کودکان3 تا 16 ساله مبتلا به اوتیسم در تهران است.
روش کار: به این منظور از جامعه پژوهش مشتمل بر کودکان دارای اختلال اوتیسم تعداد 100 کودک  3 تا 16 سال انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، مجموعه آزمون سنجش حرکتی کودکان-ویرایش دوم بود، داده‌ها توسط دو آزمونگر که با نحوه اجرای آزمون آشنایی داشتند و بر اساس دستورالعمل کتابچه راهنمای آزمون جمع‌آوری شد. پایایی بین آزمونگرها و آزمون-آزمون مجدد با فاصله زمانی دو هفته ای و پایایی همسانی درونی محاسبه شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار spss نسخه 23 انجام شد. سطح معنی داری 01/0p < در نظر گرفته شده است.
نتایج: پایایی بین آزمونگرها از طریق محاسبه ضریب همبستگی درون طبقه ای برای مهارت چالاکی انگشتان 973/0، مهارت دریافت و پرتاب 948/0 و مهارت تعادل 967/0 و نمره کل آزمون970/0 بود. در پایایی درون آزمونگر ضریب همبستگی برای مهارت چالاکی انگشتان 950/0، مهارت دریافت و پرتاب 902/0 و مهارت تعادل 942/0 و نمره کل آزمون948/0 بدست آمد. ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به منظور بررسی همسانی درونی آزمون، در مهارت چالاکی انگشتان 856/0، مهارت دریافت و پرتاب 836/0 و مهارت تعادل 924/0 و نمره کل آزمون917/0 بدست آمد.
نتیجه گیری: بر پایه یافته های بدست آمده می توان نتیجه گیری نمود که این آزمون را به عنوان آزمونی پایا جهت سنجش رشد حرکتی کودکان و نوجوانان اوتیسم شهر تهران می توان بکار گرفت.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2) in children with autism spectrum disorder aged 3-16 years in Tehran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hadi Khoran 1
  • Ghasemi Abdollah 2
  • Meysam Rezaie 3
  • Masoumeh Shojaei 4
1 1. Ph.D student of motor behavior and motor development, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 2. Assistant Professor Department of Humanities, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor Department of Humanities, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
4 Associate professor,Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Background and Aim: Autism, as a developmental disorder, always causes problems for children in their lives and continuously leads them to isolation and away from society and finding a reliable instrument for this disorder is a need. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of theMovement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2) in children with autism spectrum disorder aged 3-16 years in Tehran.
Materials and Methods: In the current study, 100 children with autism disorder aged 3 to 16 years were selected. The instrument used in this study was the Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2). The data was collected by two testers who were familiar with the test, and according to the manual of the test. The reliability between testers, test-retest reliability with a two-week interval and internal consistency reliability were calculated. All tests were two- tailed, and p < 0.01 was considered significant. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 23, SPSS).
Results: Reliability between testers was calculated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient for manual dexterity skill 0.973, aim and cache skill 0.948, balance Skill 0.967 and total score 0.970. In the internal reliability of the test, correlation coefficient was obtained for the skill of the manual dexterity  0.950, aim and cache skill 0.902, balance skill 0.942 and total score 0.948. To verify the internal consistency of the test, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was obtained in manual dexterity Skill 0.856, aim and cache skill 0.836, balance skill  0.924 and total score  0.917.
Conclusion: According to the results, theMABC-2 Test is a reliable measure to assess motor development in autistic children and adolescents in Tehran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • high performance autism disorder
  • assessment of children's motor competence
  • reliability
  • standard test
  • motor development
1 Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults: Boston;
2012.
.2 Psychiatric Aao. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Pub;
2013.
.4 Shockley, layesky. Nebraska Autism Parent Booklet2003.
.5 Rellini E, Tortolani D, Trillo S, Carbone S, Montecchi F. Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and Autism
Behavior Checklist (ABC) Correspondence and Conflicts with DSM-IV. journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorder. 2004;34(6).
.6 .mahan s, Matson JL. Children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders compared to typically
developing controls on the Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2). Research in Autism
Spectrum Disorders. 2011;5(1):119-25.
.7 Sarah Brantner, Piek JP, Smith LM. Evaluation of the validity of the MAND in assessing motor impairment in
young children. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(4):413-21.
.8 liu J, Breslin. Fine and gross motor performance of the MABC-2 by children with autism spectrum disorder
and typically developing children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2013;7(10):1244-9.
.9 MacDonaldMegan, Ulrich D. Motor skills and calibrated autism severity in young children with autism
spectrum disorder. Adapt Phys Active IQ. 2014;31(2):95-105.
.10 Backer. T, M. A, Koot HM, Begeer S. Reliability and Validity of the Interactive Drawing Test: A Measure of
Reciprocity for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(7):1967-77.
.11 Bastiaansen, Ketelaars C, Keysers C, Meffert H, Pijnenborg M, Bildt Ad, et al. Diagnosing autism spectrum
disorders in adults: the use of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) module 4. J Autism Dev Disord.
2011;41(9):1256-66.
.12 MacDonaldMegan, Staples, Zimmer. Assessment of motor behavior among children and adolescents with
ASD.
International Journal Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2012.
.13 Henderson L, Sugden DA, A. B. Movement assessment battery for children-2: Movement ABC-2: Examiner's
manual: Pearson Sao Paulo; 2007.
.14 Travers BG, Destiche D, Duffield. TC, Bigler. ED, Samsin. D, Lange. N, et al. Brainstem White Matter
Predicts Individual Differences in Manual Motor Difficulties and Symptom Severity in Autism. J Autism Dev Disord.
2015;45(9):3030-40.
.15 Liu J, Breslin. The effect of a picture activity schedule on performance of the MABC-2 for children with
autism spectrum disorder. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(2):206-12.
.16 Davis AS, Lisa., Finch WH, Rimonds, woodcock RW. The canonical relationship between sensory-motor
functioning and cognitive processing in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of clinical
neuropsychology. 2009:acp032.
.17 Hill EL. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2001;36(null):149.
.18 Niemeijer AS, Schoemaker MM, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Physical therapy. 2006;86(null):1221.
.19 Niemeijer AS, Schoemaker MM, Smits-Engelsman BC. Are teaching principles associated with improved
motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder? A pilot study. Physical therapy.
2006;86(9):1221-30.
.20 Jongmans MJ, Smits-Engelsman BCM, Schoemaker MM. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2003;36(6):528.
.21 Henderson SE, Sugden DA. Movement assessment battery for children1992. null p.
.22 Travers BG, Bigler ED, Tromp do PM, Adluru N, Destiche D, Samsin D, et al. Brainstem White Matter
Predicts Individual Differences in Manual Motor Difficulties and Symptom Severity in Autism. J Autism Dev Disord.
2015;45(9):3030-40.
.23 Ellinoudis T, Evaggelinou C, Kourtessis T, Konstantinidou Z, Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Reliability and
validity of age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children--second edition. Research in developmental
disabilities. 2011;32(3):1046-51.
.24 Hua J, Gu G, Zhu Q, Wo D, Liu M, Liu JQ, et al. The reliability and validity of the Developmental
Coordination Disorder Questionnaire'07 for children aged 4-6 years in mainland China. Research in developmental
disabilities. 2015;47:405-15.
.25 Valentini NC, Ramalho MH, Oliveira MA. Movement assessment battery for children-2: translation,
reliability, and validity for Brazilian children. Research in developmental disabilities. 2014;35(3):733-40.
.26 Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Ellinoudis T, Fatouros I, Giannakidou D, Kourtessis T. Can the movement
assessment battery for children-test be the "gold standard" for the motor assessment of children with Developmental
Coordination Disorder? Research in developmental disabilities. 2011;32(1):1-10.
.27 Smits-Engelsman BC, Niemeijer AS, van Waelvelde H. Is the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2nd
edition a reliable instrument to measure motor performance in 3 year old children? Research in developmental
disabilities. 2011;32(4):1370-7.
.28 Holm I, Tveter AT, Aulie VS, Stuge B. High intra-and inter-rater chance variation of the movement
assessment battery for children 2, ageband 2. Research in developmental disabilities. 2013;34(2):795-800.
.29 Wuang YP, Su CY, Huang MH. Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in
preschoolers with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56(6):567-78.
.30 Dewey D, G. S, Kaplan BJ, Crawford, Wilson BN. Developmental coordination disorder: Associated problems
in attention, learning, and psychosocial adjustment. Human Movement Science. 2002;21(5-6):905-18.
.31 Dewey D, Wilson BN. Developmental coordination disorder: what is it2001. 5-27 p.
.32 Louwerse A, Eussen ML, Van der Ende J, de Nijs PF, Van Gool AR, Dekker LP, et al. ASD Symptom
Severity in Adolescence of Individuals Diagnosed with PDD-NOS in Childhood: Stability and the Relation with
Psychiatric Comorbidity and Societal Participation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(12):3908-18.
.33 Pusponegoro HD, Efar P, Soedjatmiko, Soebadi A, Firmansyah A, Chen HJ, et al. Gross Motor Profile and Its
Association with Socialization Skills in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Pediatr Neonatol. 2016.
.34 Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children-2: Movement ABC-2:
Examiner's manual: Pearson São Paulo; 2007.
.35 Chow SM, Chan L-L, Chan CP, Lau CH. Reliability of the experimental version of the Movement ABC.
British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2002;9(10):404-7.
.36 Wuang YP, Su JH, Su CY. Reliability and responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for ChildrenSecond Edition Test in children with developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(2):160-5.