تبیین روابط ساختاری رفتارهای حفظ همسر بر اساس صفات پاتولوژیک شخصیت: نقش میانجیگر نظام ارزشی همسر و عملکرد زوج

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد رودهن، رودهن، ایران

3 استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه
این پژوهش با هدف تبیین روابط ساختاری رفتارهای حفظ همسر بر اساس صفات پاتولوژیک شخصیت: نقش میانجیگر نظام ارزشی همسر و عملکرد زوج انجام شد.
روش کار
روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع همبستگی با رویکرد مدل ساختاری بود. از جامعه آماری زوجین دانشجو در دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی‎واحد علوم تحقیقات و واحد رودهن، با استفاده از روش دردسترس، 378 نمونه انتخاب شد و به پرسشنامه­های رفتارهای حفظ همسر، صفات پاتولوژیک شخصیت، نظام ارزشی همسر و عملکرد زوج پاسخ دادند. داده-های پژوهش با استفاده از تحلیل مسیر و مدل ساختاری تحلیل شد.
نتایج
ضریب مسیر کل بین صفات پاتولوژیک شخصیت با رفتارهای مثبت حفظ همسر منفی و با رفتارهای منفی حفظ همسر مثبت و در سطح 01/0 معنادار بود. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که نظام ارزشی همسر و عملکرد زوج­ها، ارتباط بین رفتارهای حفظ همسر و صفات پاتولوژیک شخصیت را بطور معنی­داری میانجی­گری می­کند.
نتیجه ­گیری
با تقویت نظام ارزشی همسر و عملکرد زوجین می­توان رفتارهای حفظ همسر و در نتیجه رضایت زناشویی را بهبود بخشید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Structural Relationships of Spouse Preservation Behaviors Based on Personality Pathological Traits: The Mediating Role of the Spouse Value System and Couple Performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mina Kefaei Kivi 1
  • Hayideh Saberi 2
  • Bita Nasrollahi 3
1 PhD Student in Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Roudehen, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: This study was conducted with the aim of explaining the structural relationships of spouse-based behaviors based on the pathological traits of personality: the mediating role of the spouse's value system and the couple's performance.
Method: The present study method was correlational with the structural model approach. From the statistical population of student couples in Islamic Azad Universities, Research Sciences Branch and Roudehen Branch, 378 samples were selected using the available method. The couple responded. The research data were analyzed using path analysis and structural model.
Results: The overall path coefficient between the pathological traits of personality with positive behaviors of maintaining a negative spouse and with negative behaviors of maintaining a positive spouse was significant at the level of 0.01. The results also showed that the spouse's value system and the couple's performance mediate the relationship between Spouse Preservation Behaviors and the character's pathological traits.
Conclusion: By strengthening the value system of the spouse and the performance of the spouse, the behaviors of maintaining the spouse and thus marital satisfaction can be improved.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spouse Preservation Behaviors
  • Pathological personality traits
  • Spouse value system
  • Couple performance

مراجع

  1. Mousavi F. Dimensions of marital quality; review of predictors of components of interaction and ways to resolve
    marital conflict. Two Quarterly Journal of Applied Counseling. 2018; 7 (1) 81-100
    2. Buss DM, Shackelford TK, McKibbin WF. The mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and
    Individual Differences. 2008 Jan 1;44(1):322-34.
    3. Amato PR, Previti D. People's reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of
    family issues. 2003 Jul;24(5):602-26.
    4. Buss DM, Shackelford TK. From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of
    personality and social psychology. 1997 Feb;72(2):346.
    5. Pham MN, Shackelford TK, Holden CJ, Zeigler-Hill V, Sela Y, Jeffery AJ. Men’s benefit-provisioning mate
    retention behavior mediates the relationship between their agreeableness and their oral sex behaviors. Archives of
    Sexual Behavior. 2015 Aug 1;44(6):1723-8.
    6. Michalski RL, Shackelford TK. Evolutionary personality psychology: Reconciling human nature and individual
    differences. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010 Apr 1;48(5):509-16.
    7. McKibbin WF, Miner EJ, Shackelford TK, Ehrke AD, Weekes-Shackelford VA. Men’s mate retention varies with
    men’s personality and their partner’s personality. Personality and individual differences. 2014 Jan 1; 56:62-7.
    8. Atari M, Barbaro N, Sela Y, Shackelford TK, Chegeni R. The Big Five personality dimensions and mate retention
    behaviors in Iran. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017 Jan 1;104:286-90.
    9. Schmitt DP, Buss DM. Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of
    personality and Social Psychology. 2001 Jun;80(6):894.
    10. Apostolou M, Papadopoulou I, Georgiadou P. Are people single by choice? Involuntary singlehood in an
    evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychological Science. 2019 Mar 15;5(1):98-103.
    11. Thomas KM, Yalch MM, Krueger RF, Wright AG, Markon KE, Hopwood CJ. The convergent structure of DSM-5
    personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):308-11.
    12. Lopes GS, Sela Y, Shackelford TK. Endorsement of existence values predicts mate retention behaviors. Personality
    and Individual Differences. 2017 Jul 15; 113:184-6.
    13. Robert T. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection & the Descent of Man, Aldine de Gruyter,
    New York. 1972:136-79.
    14. Maner JK, Gailliot MT, DeWall CN. Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias.
    Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007 Jan 1;28(1):28-36.
    15. Miner EJ, Starratt VG, Shackelford TK. It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and
    Individual Differences. 2009 Aug 1;47(3):214-8.
    16. Apostolou M. Past, present, and why people struggle to establish and maintain intimate relationships. Evolutionary
    Behavioral Sciences. 2015 Oct;9(4):257.
    17. Chegeni R, Pirkalani RK, Dehshiri G. On love and darkness: The Dark Triad and mate retention behaviors in a nonWestern culture. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018 Feb 1;122:43-6.
    18. Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait
    model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological medicine. 2012 Sep;42(9):1879-90.
  2. 19. da Costa HP, Vrabel JK, Zeigler-Hill V, Vonk J. DSM-5 pathological personality traits are associated with the
    ability to understand the emotional states of others. Journal of Research in Personality. 2018 Aug 1;75:1-1.
    20. Edlund JE, Sagarin BJ. Sex differences in jealousy: Misinterpretation of nonsignificant results as refuting the theory.
    Personal Relationships. 2009 Mar;16(1):67-78.
    21. Holden CJ, Roof CH, McCabe G, Zeigler-Hill V. Detached and antagonistic: Pathological personality features and
    mate retention behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015 Sep 1; 83:77-84.
    22. Holden CJ, Zeigler-Hill V, Pham MN, Shackelford TK. Personality features and mate retention strategies: Honesty–
    humility and the willingness to manipulate, deceive, and exploit romantic partners. Personality and Individual
    Differences. 2014 Jan 1; 57:31-6.
    23.Jonason PK, Li NP, Buss DM. The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate
    retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010 Mar 1;48(4):373-8.
    24. Tragesser SL, Benfield J. Borderline personality disorder features and mate retention tactics. Journal of personality
    disorders. 2012 Jun;26(3):334-44.
    25. Starratt VG, Weekes-Shackelford V, Shackelford TK. Mate value both positively and negatively predicts intentions
    to commit an infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017 Jan 1;104:18-22.
    26. Phillips A. Indignation or insecurity: The influence of mate value on distress in response to infidelity. Evolutionary
    Psychology. 2010 Oct 1;8(4):147470491000800413.
    27. Chaudhary N, Al-Shawaf L, Buss DM. Mate competition in Pakistan: Mate value, mate retention, and competitor
    derogation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018 Aug 1;130:141-6.
    28. De Miguel A, Buss DM. Mate retention tactics in Spain: Personality, sex differences, and relationship status.
    Journal of personality. 2011 Jun;79(3):563-86
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 63، شماره 5
آذر و دی 1399
صفحه 2924-2938

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار