مقایسه فراتحلیل اثربخشی درمان های موج دوم و سوم بر درد مزمن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری روانشناسی سلامت، دانشگاه پیام نور واحد امارات

2 استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: محققان به دنبال یافتن رویکردهای درمانی موثرتر در جهت درمان بیماری های مختلف می باشند. مطالعه حاضر با هدفمقایسه فراتحلیل اثربخشی درمان های موج دوم و سوم بر درد مزمن انجام شد.
روش کار: روش پژوهش فراتحلیل می‌باشد. جامعه موردمطالعه شامل تمامی مقالات علمی پژوهشی چاپ‌شده در داخل ایران می‌باشد که در حیطه مداخلات اثربخشی درمان‌های موج دوم و سوم روان‌شناختی درد مزمن انجام‌شده‌اند. حجم نمونه نیز شامل مقالات علمی پژوهشی می‌باشند که در فاصله سال‌های 1380 تا 1398 چاپ‌شده‌اند و ازلحاظ روش‌شناسی شرایط لازم را داشته باشد. ابزار پژوهش عبارت از چک‌لیست تحلیل محتوا با بررسی میزان اندازه اثر هرکدام از روان‌درمانی‌های موج‌های دوم و سوم می‌باشد. مقیاس اندازه اثر تفاوت میانگین معیار بود و تحلیل آماری با نرم‌افزار جامع فراتحلیل انجام شد.
 نتایج: نتایج نشان داد که میانگین اندازه اثر کوهن در مطالعات موج دوم 816/1 و در مطالعات موج سوم 181/1 می­باشد و 74 درصد موارد، روان‌درمانی موج دوم و در 65 درصد موارد، روان‌درمانی موج سوم برشدت درد مزمن تأثیر بسزایی دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می‌رسد که روان‌درمانی موج دوم و سوم بر کاهش شدت درد مزمن در حد بالایی اثرگذار است. اگرچه اثر روان‌درمانی موج دوم بیشتر می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second and third wave therapies on chronic pain

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bentolhoda Sobati 1
  • Hossein Zara 2
  • Susan ALizadehfard 3
  • Mahdiyeh Rahmanian 4
1 PhD student,Department of health, psychology,Emarat,Branch Payamenoor
2 Professor, Department of psychology, Payanenoor, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of psychology, Payamenoor, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant professor, Department of psychology, Payamenoor, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Researchers seek to find more effective therapeutic approaches to treat various diseases. The aim of this study was to compare meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second and third wave therapies on chronic pain.
Methods: The research method is meta-analysis. The study population includes all scientific research articles published in Iran that have been performed in the field of effectiveness of second and third wave psychological treatments for chronic pain. The sample size also includes scientific research articles that have been published between 2001 and 2017 and have the necessary conditions in terms of methodology. The research tool is a content analysis checklist by examining the magnitude of the effect of each of the second and third wave psychotherapies. The effect size scale was the mean difference and the statistical analysis was performed with comprehensive meta-analysis software.
Results: The results showed that the average size of Cohen's effect in the second wave studies was 1.816 and in the third wave studies was 1.181 and in 74% of cases, second wave psychotherapy and in 65% of cases, third wave psychotherapy had a significant effect on chronic pain intensity. has it.
Conclusion: It seems that the second and third wave psychotherapy has a high effect on reducing the severity of chronic pain. However, the effect of the second wave of psychotherapy is greater.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Second wave therapies
  • Third wave therapies
  • Chronic pain
1. Fuchs T. Are mental illnesses diseases of the brain. Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of
neuroscience. 2012:331-44.
2. Leary MR, Leder S. The nature of hurt feelings: Emotional experience and cognitive appraisals. Feeling hurt in close
relationships. 2009:15-33.
3. Singh P, Chaturvedi A. Complementary and alternative medicine in cancer pain management: a systematic review. Indian journal
of palliative care. 2015;21(1):105.
4. Patil S, Sen S, Bral M, Reddy S, Bradley KK, Cornett EM, et al. The role of acupuncture in pain management. Current pain and
headache reports. 2016;20(4):22.
5. Rushton DN. Electrical stimulation in the treatment of pain. Disability and rehabilitation. 2002;24(8):407-15.
6. Bittar RG, Otero S, Carter H, Aziz TZ. Deep brain stimulation for phantom limb pain. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.
2005;12(4):399-404.
7. Alizadehfard S. The Effect of Life Review Group Therapy on Elderly With Chronic Pain. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing.
2012;7(2):60-7.
8. Vesal M, Taher Neshatdoost H. Meta-analysis of psychological intervention`s effectiveness on reduction of pain intensity among
patients with chronic pain. Anesthesiology and Pain. 2019;10(3):21-38.
9. Macrae W. Chronic pain after surgery. British journal of anaesthesia. 2001;87(1):88-98.
10. Müller M, Kamping S, Benrath J, Skowronek H, Schmitz J, Klinger R, et al. Treatment history and placebo responses to
experimental and clinical pain in chronic pain patients. European Journal of Pain. 2016;20(9):1530-41.
11. Astin JA, Shapiro SL, Eisenberg DM, Forys KL. Mind-body medicine: state of the science, implications for practice. The Journal
of the American Board of Family Practice. 2003;16(2):131-47.
12. Hassett AL, Gevirtz RN. Nonpharmacologic treatment for fibromyalgia: patient education, cognitive-behavioral therapy,
relaxation techniques, and complementary and alternative medicine. Rheumatic Disease Clinics. 2009;35(2):393-407.
13. Cooper JJ, Korb AS, Akil M. Bringing neuroscience to the bedside. Focus. 2019;17(1):2-7.
14. Davis GC. Endorphins and pain. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1983;6(3):473-87.
15. Bonta IL. Acupuncture beyond the endorphin concept? Medical Hypotheses. 2002;58(3):221-4.
16. McCarberg BH, Nicholson BD, Todd KH, Palmer T, Penles LJAjot. The impact of pain on quality of life and the unmet needs of
pain management: results from pain sufferers and physicians participating in an Internet survey. 2008;15(4):312-20.
17. Woolf CJ, Max MBJTJotASoA. Mechanism-based pain diagnosis: issues for analgesic drug development. 2001;95(1):241-9.
18. Hesmati R. Predicting of chronic pain based on early maladaptive schema %J Anesthesiology and Pain. Journal of
Anesthesiology and pain. 2016;7(3):49-60.
19. Heidari H, Rohani Rassaf J, Kardoust Fini K. From Freud to Maslow: Transformation of Paradigms in Psychology of Religion in
Modern Era. journal of Religious studie. 2017;10(20):61-91.
20. Zare H, kharaman A. A meta-analysis on gender differences in ethical decision making. Social Cognition. 2020;1(17):123-42.
21. Hamid N, Ramazan Saatchi L, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on pain intensity and
mental health of female patients with chronic low back pain referred to specialized clinics in Tehran. Journal of Clinical
Psychology Studies. 2013;10(3):95-113.
22. Kolivand P, Nazari Mahin A, Jafari R. The Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Pain Intensity in Patients with Chronic
Pain %J The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2015;3(3):70-5.
23. Mohammadi F, Mohammadkhani P, Dolatshahi B, Asghari MA. The Effects of “Mindfulness Meditation for Pain Management”
on the Severity of Perceived Pain and Disability in Patients With Chronic Pain %J Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing.
2011;6(19):59-66.
24. Flor H, Turk DCJJobm. Chronic back pain and rheumatoid arthritis: predicting pain and disability from cognitive variables.
1988;11(3):251-65.
25. Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK, Kerns RDJHp. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain.
2007;26(1):1.
26. Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial
rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. 2015;350.
27. Sharifnezhad A, Toozandejani H, Porsharifi H, Kamyar AJAiEB. The impact of cognitive--behavioral therapy on pain in patients
undergoing hemodialysis in 22nd of Bahman hospital in Nishapur. 2014:23-8.
28. Carpenter KM, Stoner SA, Mundt JM, Stoelb BJTCjop. An online self-help CBT intervention for chronic lower back pain.
2012;28(1):14.
29. Glombiewski JA, Holzapfel S, Riecke J, Vlaeyen JW, de Jong J, Lemmer G, et al. Exposure and CBT for chronic back pain: An
RCT on differential efficacy and optimal length of treatment. 2018;86(6):533.