مقایسه اثربخشی برنامه پیشگیری پنسیلوانیای کلاسیک و برنامه پیشگیری پنسیلوانیا براساس معیارهای ایرانی اسلامی ‎بر روابط موضوعی مادران کودکان مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیسم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی، گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران

2 استاد، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

3 گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: استفاده از برنامه‎ها و مقایسه آن‎ها با هم با توجه به موقعیت‎های فرهنگی قومی‎در بیشتر نقاط دنیا یکی از تحقیقات مد نظر دانشمندان می‎باشد. بنابراین؛ هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی مقایسه‎ای اثربخشی برنامه پیشگیری پنسیلوانیا به دو صورت کلاسیک و منطبق شده با معیارهای ایرانی اسلامی ‎بر روابط موضوعی مادران کودکان مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیسم بود.
روش کار: بدین منظور از بین  مادران دانش آموزان مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیسم که در مرکز توان بخشی شاهرود دارای پرونده بودند و ابتلاء آنها به اختلال اوتیسم توسط یک روان پزشک شناسایی و ثبت شده بود 45  نفر داوطلب به صورت در دسترس انتخاب شده و به صورت کاملا تصادفی در دو گروه مداخله و یک گروه کنترل جایگزین شدند، به گونه‎ای که هر گروه 15 نفر را شامل شد. مداخلات در پنج جلسه هفتگی دو ساعته صورت گرفت و شرکت کنندگان قبل و بعد از آن  به پرسشنامه روابط موضوعی بل پاسخ دادند. تحلیل داده‎ها با استفاده از روش آماری کووارانس چندمتغیره انجام شد.
نتایج: نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که بین اثربخشی این دو روش مداخله بر روابط موضوعی مادران کودکان مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیسم تفاوت معنی داری وجود دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می‎رسد که برنامه پیشگیری پنسیلوانیا بر اساس معیارهای ایرانی اسلامی ‎مقیاس‎های دلبستگی نا ایمن و بی‎کفایتی اجتماعی روابط موضوعی مادران کودکان مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیسم اثرگذار باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of Effectiveness of Pennsylvania Prevention Program in Clasic Form and Pennsylvania Prevention Program in Accordance With Iranian Islamic Standards on Objective Relations in Mothers Of Children With Autism Specrtom Disorders

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoomeh Ghodrati 1
  • Mohammad Hatami 2
  • Hakimeh Aghaei 3
1 Phd. Student‚ Department of Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University‚ shahroud, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
3 Department of Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University‚ shahroud, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Using programs and comparing them with each other according to ethnic cultural situations in most parts of the world is one of the researches considered by scientists. Therefore; the aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the Pennsylvania prevention program in both classical and adapted to Iranian-Islamic criteria on the thematic relationships of mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders.
Methods: For this purpose, among the mothers of students with autism spectrum disorders who had a file in Shahroud Rehabilitation Center and their autism was identified and registered by a psychiatrist, 45 volunteers were selected by availability and completely randomly. They were replaced in two intervention groups and one control group, so that each group included 15 people. The interventions were performed in five two-hour weekly sessions and participants answered the Bell Thematic Relationship Questionnaire before and after. Data analysis was performed using multivariate covariance statistical method.
Results: The results of the research showed that there is a significant difference between the effectiveness of these two methods of intervention on the thematic relationships of mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders.
Conclusion: The Pennsylvania Prevention Program seems to be effective based on Iranian-Islamic criteria for insecure attachment scales and social incompetence Thematic relationships of mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pennsylvania Prevention Program
  • Iranian Islamic Standards
  • Objective Relations
  • Mothers
  • Autism
1. Chugani DC, Chugani HT, Wiznitzer M, Parikh S, Evans PA, Hansen RL, et al. Efficacy of low-dose buspirone for restricted and
repetitive behavior in young children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized trial. The Journal of pediatrics. 2016;170:45 .53-e4.
2. Brookman-Frazee L, Drahota A, Stadnick N, Palinkas LA. Therapist perspectives on community mental health services for children with
autism spectrum disorders. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2012;.365-73:)5(39
3. Cartwright C, Beskina S. Engaging autism: Using the floortime approach to help children relate, communicate and think. 2007.
4. Volkmar FR, Klin A. Issues in the classification of autism and related conditions. 2005.
5. Findler L, Jacoby AK, Gabis L. Subjective happiness among mothers of children with disabilities: The role of stress, attachment, guilt
and social support. Research in developmental disabilities. 2016;55:44-54.
6. Gobrial E. The lived experiences of mothers of children with the autism spectrum disorders in Egypt. Social sciences. 2018;7(8):133.
7. Bujnowska AM, Rodríguez C, García T, Areces D, Marsh NV. Parenting and future anxiety: The impact of having a child with
developmental disabilities. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019;16(4):668.
8. Saini M, Stoddart KP, Gibson M, Morris R, Barrett D, Muskat B, et al. Couple relationships among parents of children and adolescents
with autism spectrum disorder: Findings from a scoping review of the literature. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2015;17:142-
57.
9. Manuel JC. Risk and resistance factors in the adaptation in mothers of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Pediatric
Psychology. 2001;26(4):237-46.
10. Oberst A, Pop C, Tremblay AG, Blais V, Denault J-B, Salvesen GS, et al. Inducible dimerization and inducible cleavage reveal a
requirement for both processes in caspase-8 activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(22):16632-42.
11. Bienenfeld D. Psychodynamic theory for clinicians: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
12. Herbert GL, McCormack V, Callahan JL. An investigation of the object relations theory of depression. Psychoanalytic Psychology.
2010;27(2):219.
13. Forgeard M, Seligman M. Seeing the glass half full: A review of the causes and consequences of optimism. Pratiques psychologiques.
2012;18(2):107-20.
14. Lopez SJ, Pedrotti JT, Snyder CR. Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths: Sage publications;
2.018
15. Seligman ME. Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. Handbook of positive psychology. 2002;2(2002):3-12.
16. Beasley M, Thompson T, Davidson J. Resilience in response to life stress: the effects of coping style and cognitive hardiness. Personality
and Individual differences. 2003;34(1):77-95.
17. Misra R, McKean M, West S, Russo T. Academic stress of college students: Comparison of student and faculty perceptions. College
Student Journal. 2000;34(2.)
18. Keikelame MJ, Swartz L. Lost opportunities to improve health literacy: observations in a chronic illness clinic providing care for patients
with epilepsy in Cape Town South Africa. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2013;26(1):36-41.
19. Pahlavan-Neshan S, Pourmohammadreza-Tajrishi Ms, Sajedi F, Shokri O. The Effect of Psychological Immunization Program on
Pessimistic Attribution Style of Boy Students with Dyslexia. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2014;15(3):52-63.
20. Porrahimi Mrny M, Ahadi H, Askary P, Bkhtyarpoor S. Effectiveness of Penn Resiliency Program on Students’ Coping Strategies,
Quality of Life & Optimism. Achievements of Clinical Psychology. 2015;1(1):25-40.
21. Shokri O, Shahidi S, Mazaheri M, Fathabadi J, Rahiminejad SP, Khanjani M. Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Immunization
Intervention Program for Undergraduates against Negative Emotional Experiences Based on the Pennsylvania Preventive Model.
Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2014;4(7):165-90.
22. Hefti R. Integrating religion and spirituality into mental health care, psychiatry and psychotherapy. Religions. 2011;2(4):611-27.
23. Gable SL, Haidt J. What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of general psychology. 2005;9(2):103-10.
24. Hadinezhad H, Tabatabaeian M, Dehghani, Mahmoud. A Preliminary Study for Validity and Reliability of Bell Object Relations and
Reality Testing Inventory. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2014;20(2):162-9.
25. Ghodrati M. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral education on the thematic relationships of mothers of autistic students. Shahroud:
Islamic Azad University; 2014.
26. Ruiz-Robledillo N, Moya-Albiol L. Effects of a cognitive-behavioral intervention program on the health of caregivers of people with
autism spectrum disorder. Psychosocial Intervention. 2015;24(1):33-9.
27. Riahi F, Khajeddin N, Izadi Mazidi S, Eshrat T, Naghdi Nasab L. The Effect of Supportive and Cognitive- Behavior Group Therapy on
Mental Health and Irrational Believes of Mothers of Autistic Children. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2012;10(6):637-45.
28. Connolly P. Racism, gender identities and young children: Social relations in a multi-ethnic, inner city primary school: Routledge; 2002.
29. Bell MD. Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory :BORRTI: Western Psychological Services; 2007.
30. Ozer S, Bertelsen P, Singla R, Schwartz SJ. “Grab Your Culture and Walk with the Global” Ladakhi Students’ Negotiation of Cultural
Identity in the Context of Globalization-Based Acculturation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017;48(3):294-318.
31. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Attachment; John Bowlby: Basic books; 1969.
32. Hockenbury DH, Hockenbury SE. Discovering psychology: Macmillan; 2010.
33. Felner R, Lease A, Phillips R. Social competence and the language of adequacy as a subject matter for psychology: A quadripartite trilevel framework. The development of social competence in adolescence. 1990;3.