اثربخشی بسته غنی‌سازی ارتباطات خانواده‌های ازدواج مجدد بر عملکرد خانواده آنها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مشاوره، واحد بروجرد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بروجرد، ایران

2 گروه روان شناسی، واحد بروجرد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بروجرد، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

3 گروه رفتار حرکتی، واحد بروجرد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بروجرد، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: با در نظر گرفتن آمار بالای طلاق و لزوم ازدواج مجدد، وجود ارتباطات بین فردی و درون خانوادگی و تاثیر آن بر عملکرد خانواده هایازدواج مجدد انکارناپذیر است، با توجه به اهمیت موضوع، این پژوهش با هدف بررسی اثربخشی مداخله مبتنی بر غنی-سازی ارتباطات بر عملکردخانواده در خانواده‌های ازدواج مجدد در شهر خرمآباد انجام شد.
روش کار: روش این پژوهش نیمهآزمایشی و طرح پیشآزمون-پسآزمون با گروه کنترل و آزمون پیگیری بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را تمام خانواده‌های ازدواج مجدد با حداقل یک فرزندخوانده به تعداد 3654 خانواده در سال 1397 در شهر خرم آباد تشکیل دادند که 20 خانواده در دو گروه آزمایش و گواه به صورت تصادفی ساده جایگزین شدند. آزمودنی‌ها پرسشنامه عملکرد خانواده مک مستر را تکمیل کردند. والدین در گروه آزمایش تحت آموزش بسته غنی سازی ارتباطات در 12 جلسه 120 دقیقه‌ای در 5 هفته قرار گرفتند. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل اندازهگیری مکرر در نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 25 انجام گرفت.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان دهنده اثر بخش بودن بسته غنیسازی ارتباطات بر بهبود عملکرد خانواده در خانواده‌های ازدواج مجدد بود.
نتیجه گیری: استفاده از بسته غنیسازی ارتباطات خانواده‌های ازدواج مجدد می‌تواند به بهبود عملکرد خانواده کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effectiveness of enriching communication on family function remarried families

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gohar souri 1
  • Kourosh Goodarzi 2
  • Mehdi Roozbahani 3
1 Department of Consultation, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, borujerd, Iran.
2 Department of Psychology, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, borujerd, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3 Department of Motor Behavior, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, borujerd, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Given the high rates of divorce and the necessity of remarriage, the existence of interpersonal and intra-family relationships and its impact on remarriage families performance is undeniable. Due to the importance of the subject, this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a communication-enrichment-based intervention on family functioning in remarried families in Khorramabad.
Methods: This study was conducted as a pretest-posttest and follow-up study with unequal control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of all remarried families with at least one adopted child (3654 families) in Khoramabad city in 2019. Subjects completed the McMaster Family Function Questionnaire. Parents in the experimental group received 12-sessions in 120-minute of 5 weeks of communication enrichment training. Data analysis was performed using repeated measure analysis in SPSS software version 25.
Results: The results showed the effectiveness of communication enrichment package on performance improvement in remarried families.
Conclusion: According to the findings, it can be concluded that using the enrichment package of remarriage families can improve family functioning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Remarriage Families
  • Enrichment Package
  • Family Function
  • communication enrichment

مراجع

  1. Garðarsdóttir Ó, Björnsdóttir B. The Implications of Divorce in late 19Th-and early 20Th-Century Iceland.
    Scandinavian Journal of History. 2018;43(1):91-111.
    2. DeGreeff BL, Burnett A. Are You My Grandmother? Constructing and Maintaining Stepgrandparent Identity
    and Roles. Communication Quarterly. 2017;65(5):603-23.
    3. Präg P, Choi S, Monden C. Sibship Size in Low-Fertility Countries over the Twentieth Century: Declining Social
    Disparities. 2018.
    4. Lehtipuu O. To remarry or not to remarry? 1 Timothy 14 :5 in early Christian ascetic discourse. Studia
    Theologica-Nordic Journal of Theology. 2017;71(1):29-50.
    5. Grafsky EL, Hickey K, Nguyen HN, Wall JD. Youth disclosure of sexual orientation to siblings and extended
    family. Family relations. 2018;67(1.60-147:)
    6. Thomas LJ, Scharp KM. “A Family for Every Child”: Discursive Constructions of “Ideal” Adoptive Families in
    Online Foster Adoption Photolistings That Promote Adoption of Children from Foster Care. Adoption Quarterly.
    2017;20(1):44-64.
    7. Firmin MW, Markham RL, Pugh KC, Sohn VA, Gentry EN. Outcomes of adoption for Christian adoptive
    parents: A qualitative study. Journal of Psychology and Christianity. 2017;36(1):16.
    8. Alogna EH. The impact of training on stepfamily therapy: Chestnut Hill College.2012 ;
    9. Scott J. 10. Conflicting family interests: a challenge for family policy. Changing Family Dynamics and
    Demographic Evolution: The Family Kaleidoscope. 2016:234.
    10. Hein S, Tan M, Rakhlin N, Doyle N, Hart L, Macomber D, et al. Psychological and Sociocultural Adaptation of
    Children Adopted from Russia and their Associations with Pre-Adoption Risk Factors and Parenting. Journal of
    Child and Family Studies. 2017;26(10):2669-80.
    11. Samzelius H. The Exchange of Care between Generations in Stepfamilies. Successful ageing in an
    interdisciplinary context–popular science presentations. 2018:170.
    12. Pickering JA, Sanders MR. Integrating Parents' Views on Sibling Relationships to Tailor an Evidence‐based
    Parenting Intervention for Sibling Conflict. Family process. 2017;56(1):105-25.
  2. 13. Langton EG, Boy K. Becoming an Adoption-Friendly School: A Whole-School Resource for Supporting
    Children Who Have Experienced Trauma Or Loss-With Complementary Downloadable Material: Jessica
    Kingsley Publishers; 2017.
    14. Glidden LM. Adopted children with developmental disabilities: Post-placement family functioning. Children
    and Youth services review. 1991;13(5-6):363-77.
    15. Tarroja MCH. Preadoption risks, family functioning, and adoption secrecy as predictors of the adjustment of
    Filipino adopted children. Adoption Quarterly. 2015;18(3):234-53.
    16. McAdams T, Rijsdijk F, Neiderhiser JM, Narusyte J, Shaw D, Natsuaki M, et al. The relationship between
    parental depressive symptoms and offspring psychopathology: evidence from a children-of-twins study and an
    adoption study. Psychological medicine. 2015;45(12):2583-94.
    17. Browning S, Artelt E. Stepfamily therapy: A 10-step clinical approach: American Psychological Association;
    2012.
    18. Ganong L, Coleman M. Studying stepfamilies: Four eras of family scholarship. Family process. 2018;57(1):7-
    24.
    19. Papernow PL. The stepfamily cycle: An experiential model of stepfamily development. Family Relations.
    1984:355-63.
    20. Perry-Fraser C, Fraser R. A qualitative analysis of difficulties on transition days in blended families. Advances
    in Applied Sociology. 2017;7(06):245.
    21. Harrison T. Who am I and why does it matter?: A phenomenological study of adoption, attachment, and identity
    formation 2017.
    22. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of marital and family
    therapy. 1983;9(2):171-80.
    23. ardeshiri lordejani F, Faramarzi S, Sharifi T. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on family
    performance and parent-child relationships of the parents of children with learning disability. JPEN. 2018; 5 (1)
    :53-60
    24. Rezapour Mirsaleh Y, Eyni E, Ayyin parast N, Heshmati F. The Effectiveness of Attachment-Based Therapy on
    Family Functioning of Mothers with Insecure Attachment Style. Clinical Psychology Studies, 2014; 4 (15): 105-
    126.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 64، شماره 2
خرداد و تیر 1400
صفحه 2974-2986

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار