ارائه الگوی ساختاری پیش‌بینی آشفتگی روانی بر اساس عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی با میانجی‌گری احساس انسجام روانی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی دردانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی ، گروه روانشناسی ، واحد رودهن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، رودهن، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی ، واحدرودهن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، رودهن ، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول)

3 دانشیار ، گروه روانشناسی ، واحدرودهن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، رودهن ، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه الگوی ساختاری پیش‌بینی آشفتگی روانی بر اساس عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی با میانجی‌گری احساس انسجام روانی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی بود.
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر توصیفی و طرح پژوهش همبستگی از نوع مدل معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را تمامی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شهر تهران که در سال تحصیلی 1399-1400مشغول به تحصیل تشکیل دادند که از بین آنها، 387 نفر به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله ای انتخاب شدند. داده ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه افسردگی، اضطراب، استرس لاویوند و لاویوند (1995)، پرسشنامه عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی فریستون و همکاران (1994)، پرسشنامه احساس انسجام روانی فلنسبورگ (2006) و پرسشنامه انعطاف پذیری شناختی دنیس و ونـدروال (2010) جمع آوری شد. تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از معادلات ساختاری SEM با بهره گری از نرم افزار Amos صورت گرفت. سطح معناداری در این پژوهش ۰٫۰۵ در نظر گرفته شد.
یافته ها: یافته ها نشان داد که ضریب مسیر غیرمستقیم بین عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی و آشفتگی روانی از طریق احساس انسجام روانی و انعطاف پذیری شناختی مثبت معنادار است. بر این اساس چنین نتیجه گیری شد که احساس انسجام روانی و انعطاف پذیری شناختی به صورت مثبت و معنادار اثر عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی بر آشفتگی روانی را میانجیگری می‌کند. این موضوع بیانگر آن است که عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی، احساس انسجام روانی و انعطاف پذیری شناختی در مجموع 63 درصد از واریانس آشفتگی روانی را تبیین می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting a structural model for predicting mental disorders based on intolerance of uncertainty mediated by a sense of psychological cohesion and cognitive flexibility in students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sara Norouzi 1
  • Simin Bashardoust 2
  • Mina Mojtabaie 3
1 PhD student General Psychology , Department of Psychology , Roudehen Branch , Islamic Azad University, Roudehen , Iran.
2 Assistant Professor، Department of Psychology , Roudehen Branch , Islamic Azad University ,Roudehen ,Iran. (Corresponding author)
3 Associate Professor، Department of Psychology , Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen , Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a structural model for predicting mental disorders based on intolerance of uncertainty mediated by feelings of psychological cohesion and cognitive flexibility.

Method: The method of the present study was descriptive and the correlational research design was structural equation modeling. The statistical population of this study consisted of all undergraduate students of Islamic Azad University of Tehran who were studying in the academic year 1399-1400, from which 387 people were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling. Data were collected using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Lovind and Lavind (1995) Questionnaire, the Freeston et al. (1994) Uncertainty Intolerance Questionnaire (1994), the Flensburg (2006) Feelings of Mental Cohesion Questionnaire, and the Dennis and Vanderwall Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire (2010). شد. Research data were analyzed using SEM structural equations using Amos software. Significance level in this study was considered 0.05.

Results: The results showed that the indirect path coefficient between intolerance of uncertainty and psychological turmoil is significant through the feeling of psychological cohesion and positive cognitive flexibility. Based on this, it was concluded that the feeling of psychological cohesion and cognitive flexibility positively and significantly mediates the effect of uncertainty intolerance on mental disorder. This suggests that intolerance of uncertainty, a sense of psychological cohesion, and cognitive flexibility account for a total of 63% of the variance in psychological distress.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental disorder
  • intolerance of uncertainty
  • feeling of mental cohesion
  • cognitive flexibility

مراجع

1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct
validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2005;44(Pt 2):227-39.
2. Saged AA, Mohd Yusoff MY, Abdul Latif F, Hilmi SM, Al-Rahmi WM, Al-Samman A, Alias N, Zeki AM.
Impact of Quran in treatment of the psychological disorder and spiritual illness. Journal of religion and health.
2020 Aug;59(4):1824-37.
3. Zhou TH, Hu GL, Wang L. Psychological disorder identifying method based on emotion perception over social
networks. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 Jan;16(6):953.
4. Walter KH, Levine JA, Highfill‐McRoy RM, Navarro M, Thomsen CJ. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress
disorder and psychological comorbidities among US active duty service members, 2006–2013. Journal of
Traumatic Stress. 2018 Dec;31(6):837-44.
5. Cénat JM, Blais-Rochette C, Kokou-Kpolou CK, Noorishad PG, Mukunzi JN, McIntee SE, Dalexis RD, Goulet
MA, Labelle PR. Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and
psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Psychiatry research. 2021 Jan 1;295:113599.
6. McEvoy PM, Hyett MP, Shihata S, Price JE, Strachan L. The impact of methodological and measurement factors
on transdiagnostic associations with intolerance of uncertainty: A meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review.
2019 Nov 1;73:101778.
7. Jenkinson R, Milne E, Thompson A. The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety in autism:
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Autism. 2020 Nov;24(8):1933-44.
8. de Jong-Meyer R, Beck B, Riede K. Relationships between rumination, worry, intolerance of uncertainty and
metacognitive beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009 Mar 1;46(4):547-51.
9. Flensborg-Madsen T, Ventegodt S, Merrick J. Sense of coherence and physical health. Testing Antonovsky's
theory. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL. 2006 Oct 9;6:2212-9.
10. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social science & medicine. 1993
Mar 1;36(6):725-33.
11. Satici B, Saricali M, Satici SA, Griffiths MD. Intolerance of uncertainty and mental wellbeing: Serial mediation
by rumination and fear of COVID-19. International journal of mental health and addiction. 2020 May 15:1-2.
12. Murphy FC, Michael A, Sahakian BJ. Emotion modulates cognitive flexibility in patients with major depression.
Psychological medicine. 2012 Jul;42(7):1373-82.
13. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety
Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995;33:335 -343 .
14. Moghaddam A, Saed F, Dibajnia P, Zangeneh J. A preliminary validation of the depression, anxiety and stress
scales (DASS) in non-clinical sample. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2008 Oct 22;6(2):23-38.
15. Freeston MH, Rhéaume J, Letarte H, Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R. Why do people worry?. Personality and
individual differences. 1994 Dec 1;17(6):791-802.
16. Buhr K, Dugas MJ. Investigating the construct validity of intolerance of uncertainty and its unique relationship
with worry. Journal of anxiety disorders. 2006 Jan 1;20(2):222-36.
17. Hamidpour H, Dolatshai B, Pour shahbaz A, Dadkhah A. The Efficacy of Schema Therapy in Treating Women's
Generalized Anxiety Disorder . IJPCP. 2011; 16 (4) :420-431
18. Flensborg-Madsen T, Ventegodt S, Merrick J. Sense of coherence and physical health. Testing Antonovsky's
theory. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL. 2006 Oct 9;6:2212-9.
19. EHTESHAMZADEH, P., NAZARZADEH R. SABRI, and AVAL M. MEMARBASHI. "THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SENSE OF COHERENCE AND JOB PERFORMANCE WITH
INTERMEDIATION STRATEGIES OF COPING WITH STRESS AND MENTAL HEALTH." (2013): 83-95.
20. Dennis JP, Vander Wal JS. The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of
reliability and validity. Cognitive therapy and research. 2010 Jun;34(3):241-53.
21. Salimi A, Jokar B, Nikpour R. Internet communication in life: The role of perceived social support and
loneliness in the use of the internet. Psychological studies. 2009;5(3):81-102.
22. Shakerinasab M, Zibaei Sani M, Kazemabadi Farahani Z, Ghalehnovi Z. The relationship between perceived
stress and social anxiety with psychological cohesion in pandemic crises, with emphasis on Covid 19 patients
discharged from Sabzevar Vasei Hospital. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2021 Jun 22;13(Special Issue 2):87-
96.
23. Ebrahimi Meymand H A, Askarizadeh G, Bagheri M, Arabnejad M. The Role of Spiritual Intelligence, Sense of
Coherence, and Cognitive Flexibility as Internal Resources in Predicting Perceived Stress in Patients With
Multiple Sclerosis. Horizon Med Sci. 2020; 27 (1) :114-129
24. Li G, Zhou J, Yang G, Li B, Deng Q, Guo L. The impact of intolerance of uncertainty on test anxiety: student
athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Jun 3;12:2095.
25. Pyszkowska A, Rönnlund M. Psychological flexibility and self-compassion as predictors of well-being:
Mediating role of a balanced time perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:2110.
26. Dugas MJ, Schwartz A, Francis K. Brief report: Intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and depression. Cognitive
Therapy and Research. 2004 Dec;28(6):835-42.
27. Morriss J, Zuj DV, Mertens G. The role of intolerance of uncertainty in classical threat conditioning: Recent
developments and directions for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2021 Aug
1;166:116-26.
28. Ahadi B, Moradi F. Psychological Correlates of Intolerance of Uncertainty: (meta-analysis of Iranian articles ) .
rph. 2018; 12 (3) :101-118
29. Zhang X, Silverstein M. Intergenerational Emotional Cohesion and Psychological Well-Being of Older Adults in
Rural China: A Moderated Mediation Model of Loneliness and Friendship Ties. The Journals of Gerontology:
Series B. 2022 Mar;77(3):525-35.
30. Choi YJ, Matz-Costa C. Perceived neighborhood safety, social cohesion, and psychological health of older
adults. The Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(1):196-206.
31. Mohammadpour M, Rahimi Cham Heydari R, Ramezani N, Ahmadi R, Beiranvandi M. The Role of
Psychological Flexibility and Difficulty in Emotion Regulation in Predicting Corona Fear (Covid-19) in
Kermanshah Residents. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2021 Jun 22;13(Special Issue 2).
32. Watts R, Luoma JB. The use of the psychological flexibility model to support psychedelic assisted therapy.
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2020 Jan 1;15:92-102.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 65، شماره 2
خرداد و تیر 1401
صفحه 514-528

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار