فراوانی انطباق طرح‎های پژوهشی با اولویت‎های اعلام شده پژوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد در سال‎های 1385 الی 1396

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پزشک عمومی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 متخصص پزشکی اجتماعی

3 مرکز توسعه تحقیقات بالینی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، ایران

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: به دلیل تنوع و گستردگی عرصه‎های سلامت و همچنین محدودیت منابع، امکان فعالیت در تمامی این عرصه‎ها و پاسخگویی به تمامی نیازهای پژوهشی جامعه امری اجتناب ناپذیر است. هدف از این مطالعه بررسی میزان انطباق طرح‎های پژوهشی با اولویت‎های پژوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد می‎باشد.
مواد و روش ها: در این مطالعه مقطعی، اطلاعات طرح‎های ثبت شده در سامانه پژوهان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد از سال 1385 تا 1396 که مورد تأیید نهایی معاونت پژوهشی دانشگاه قرار گرفته و در فاز عقد قرار‎داد، در دست اجرا یا پایان‎یافته بود، استخراج شد. کد اولویت‎های پژوهشی دانشگاه از سال 1385 تا انتهای سال 1396 استخراج شده و میزان مطابقت پژوهش‎های انجام شده با آنها بررسی شد.
یافته‌ها: طرح‎های پژوهشی در بازه زمانی مورد مطالعه بیش از 4 برابر شده بود. اولویت پژوهشی خوداظهاری برای 7433 طرح توسط محقق اصلی ذکر شده بود که بر این اساس 8/44 درصد طرح‎ها (3332) منطبق بر اولویت‎های پژوهشی اعلام شده بودند. از سوی دیگر وضعیت انطباق با اولویت‎های پژوهشی برای 3889 طرح اعلام نشده بود که بعد از بررسی و مطابقت با اولویت‎های پژوهشی مشخص شد که از مجموع 11322 طرح، 5/47 درصد منطبق بر اولویت‎های پژوهشی (استخراجی) می‎باشند. هر دو شاخص مذکور در این بازه زمانی روند نزولی داشتند. وضعیت انطباق طرح‎ها با اولویت‎های پژوهشی دانشگاه بطور معناداری بر حسب پایان‎نامه بودن و مرتبه علمی مجری طرح متفاوت بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: حدود نیمی از طرحهای پژوهشی با اولویت پژوهشی مطابقت داشته و روند آن نیز دربازه زمانی مورد مطالعه کاهشی بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Accordance of Research Proposals and Research Priorities at Mashhad University Of Medical Sciences during 2006-2016

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedeh Melika Ziyafati Fahmideh Sani 1
  • Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan 2
  • Maryam Tayefi Nasrabadi 3
1 General practitioner, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Community Medicine Specialist
3 Clinical Research Development Unit, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: Due to the variety of health fields and the limited resources available, it is inevitable to prioritize research in all these areas and meet all the research needs of society. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the conformity of the plans with the research priorities of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Methods & Materials: In this cross-sectional study, data of approved proposals by vice-chancellor of research at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences during 2006 to 2016, and in the contract, ongoing or finished phases were extracted. The university research priorities code was extracted and the degree of compliance with the research topic was assessed.
Results: The research projects were increased more than four times from 2006 to 2016. The self-reported research priority for 7433 projects was stated by the lead researcher according to which 44.8% of the projects (3332) were in accordance with the research priorities. On the other hand, compliance with research priorities for 3889 projects was not announced. After reviewing and matching with research priorities, it was found that out of 11322 projects, 47.5% were in line with research priorities. Both rates had a declining trend. Compliance status of the projects with university research priorities was significantly different in terms of main provider unit, thesis, and academic rank.
Conclusion: About half of the projects corresponded to the research priority and its’ trend was decreasing in the study period.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Priority
  • research proposal
  • medicine

مراجع

  1. Kolahi A-A, Sohrabi M-R, Abdollahi M, Soori H. Setting research priority in Shahid Beheshti University of
    Medical Sciences: methods, challenges, limitations. Pajoohandeh Journal. 2010;15(4):143-51.
    2. Ghaffar A. Setting research priorities by applying the combined approach matrix. Indian Journal of Medical
    Research. 2009;129(4):368.
    3. Harrington J. Research priorities in occupational medicine: a survey of United Kingdom medical opinion by
    the Delphi technique. Occupational and environmental medicine. 1994;51(5):289-94.
    4. Sohrabi MR, Roodsari MR, Souri H, Mortazavi M, Ghanbari S, NazarAli S, et al. Research Priorities of Health
    System Research (HSR) in Vice-Chancellors of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Journal
    of Isfahan Medical School. 2011;28(119).
    5. Berger M, Murugi J, Buch E, IJsselmuiden C, Moran M, Guzman J, et al. Strengthening pharmaceutical
    innovation in Africa. Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED), New Partnership for Africa’s
    Development (NEPAD) 2009. 2010 Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) New
    Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). 2016.
    6. McGregor S, Henderson KJ, Kaldor JM. How are health research priorities set in low and middle income
    countries? A systematic review of published reports. PloS one. 2014;9(10).
    7. Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common
    themes of good practice. Health research policy and systems. 2010;8(1):36.
    8. Braunschweig T, Becker B. Choosing research priorities by using the analytic hierarchy process: an
    application to international agriculture. R&D Management. 2004;34(1):77-86.
    9. Brown K, Dyas J, Chahal P, Khalil Y, Riaz P, Cummings-Jones J. Discovering the research priorities of people
    with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(524):206-13.
    10. Ubel PA, DeKay ML, Baron J, Asch DA. Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints—is it
    equitable? New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(18):1174-7.
    11. Lloyd-Jones G, Fowell S, Bligh JG. The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in medical
    undergraduate education. Medical Education-Oxford. 1999;33(1):8-13.
    12. McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. International journal
    of clinical pharmacy. 2016;38(3):655-62.
    13. Potter B, Potter MC. Method and apparatus for automated medical diagnosis using decision tree analysis.
    Google Patents; 1988.
    14. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the
    scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the
    Medical Outcomes Study. Medical care. 1995:AS264-AS79.
    15. Council NR. Research priorities for airborne particulate matter: IV. Continuing research progress: National
    Academies Press; 2004.
    16. Martin D, Singer P. A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions. Health Care Analysis.
    2003;11(1):59-68.
    17. Azizi F. View of medical research in Iran. J Res Med Sci Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci. 1995;19(1-2):1-14.
    18. Arfa Baluchi F KH, M A. the need for assessment of the research organization, the National Conference of
    Management of research and Technology available at: http://profdocumacir/paper-abstract1027663html.2011.
    19. Karimi G, GHARAH BA, Rahbari M, Vafaiyan V, Minabsalemi E, Damari B. Need-assessment and research
    priorities-setting in IBTO Research Center. 2005.
    20. Shahamati P, DINMOHAMMADI M, Aghajanloo A. Establishment of Research Priorities of Emergency
    Units of Teaching Hospitals Affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences: A Delphi Study. 2017.
    21. Sohrabi M-R, Tahmoreszadeh S, Mohammadi F, Kolahi A-A. Research Priority Setting for Social
    Determinants of Health Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2013.
    Community Health (Salāmat-i ijtimāī). 2015;1(1):32-44.
    22. Hakimzadeh SM, Shokouh H, Morteza S, Bahadori M, Tahernezhad K. Research needs assessment and
    priority setting for health economics: a mixed method study in Iran. Journal Mil Med. 2014;16(1):23-8.p.45-51
    RiDCHROOUP.
    23. Kolahi A, Tahmooreszadeh S, Sohrabi M, Shokouhi S, Nabavi M, Besharat M. Research Priority in Infectious
    Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti Medical University in 2007. Iran J Infect
    Dis Trop Med. 2007;12(38):1-9.
    24. Malekafzali H. Medical research development guideline. Health and Medical Development Conferences
    HAtGCI, 2001, Tehran, Iran.
    25. Mohammadi M, Mesgarpour B. Systemic approach to health research in Iran and the world. 2002.
  2. 26. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The
    benchmarks of ethical research. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2004;189(5):930-7.
    27. Mohammadi M, Mesgarpour B. Systemic approach to health research in Iran and the world. Bull World Health
    Organ. 2001;79(9):834-41.
    28. Ranson MK, Bennett SC. Priority setting and health policy and systems research. Health Research Policy and
    Systems. 2009;7(1):27.
    29. Stewart RJ, Caird J, Oliver K, Oliver S. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities. Health Expectations.
    2011;14(4):439-48.
    30. Reveiz L, Elias V, Terry RF, Alger J, Becerra-Posada F. Comparison of national health research prioritysetting methods and characteristics in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002-2012. Revista Panamericana de
    Salud Pública. 2013;34:1-13.
    31. Badakhshan A, Arab M, Rashidian A, Gholipour M, Mohebbi E, Zendehdel K. Systematic review of priority
    setting studies in health research in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(8):753-69.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 65، شماره 2
خرداد و تیر 1401
صفحه 580-591

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار