مقایسه اثربخشی آموزش مفاهیم ذهن خوانی و درمان پاسخ محور بر مهارت اجتماعی کودکان مبتلا به اوتیسم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی ، گروه روانشناسی ، واحد تنکابن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تنکابن، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی ، واحد تنکابن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تنکابن ، ایران(نویسنده مسول)

3 دانشیار ، گروه روانشناسی ، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تنکابن ، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تنکابن، تنکابن، ایران.

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر با هدف مقایسه اثربخشی آموزش درمان پاسخ محور و درمان ذهن خوانی بر مهارت اجتماعی کودکان اوتیسم انجام شد.
روش تحقیق: در این پژوهش نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش آزمون – پس آزمون با گروه کنترل بود. جامعه آماری این مطالعه، کودکان مبتلا به اوتیسم در یک مرکز کودکان اوتیستیک واقع در شهر لاهیجان بودند. نمونه تحقیق شامل 45 نفر از کودکان 6 تا 13 سال مبتلا به اوتیسم بودند که به شیوه تصادفی ساده از جامعه آماری انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع آوری داده ها پرسشنامه مهارت اجتماعی گرشام و الیوت (1990) بود که توسط مربیان تکمیل شد. پس از اجرای پیش آزمون آزمون، کودکان اوتیسم به صورت تصادفی در سه گروه (یعنی دو گروه آزمایشی و یک گروه کنترل) 15 نفره جایگزین شدند. سپس گروه آموزش مفاهیم ذهن خوانی به مدت 10 جلسه و گروه درمان پاسخ محور به مدت 8 جلسه تحت آموزش انفرادی قرار گرفتند. پس از اتمام مداخلات، پس آزمون به عمل آمد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از آزمون آماری تحلیل کوواریانس نشان داد درمان پاسخ محور و درمان ذهن خوانی بر مهارت اجتماعی کودکان اوتیسم موثر است و درمان ذهن خوانی نسبت به آموزش درمان پاسخ محور در میزان مولفه های مهارت اجتماعی اثربخشی بیشتری دارد (01/0> P). استفاده از این دو روش درمانی به درمانگران، روانشناسان و مربیانی که در راستای آموزش به کودکان اوتیستیک پیشنهاد می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the effectiveness of teaching the concepts of mind reading and response-based therapy on children's social skills With autism

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Aflaki 1
  • Mohammadreza Zarbakhsh Bahri 2
  • Shahnam Abolghasemi 3
  • Taher Tizdast 4
1 PhD Student in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran(Corresponding Athor
3 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon Branch, Tonekabon, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of response therapy and mind reading therapy training on children's social skills Autism was performed. The research method in this study was quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population of this study was children with autism in an autistic children center located in the city of Al-Hijan. The sample consisted of 45 children aged 6 to 13 years with autism who were selected by simple random sampling from the statistical population. Data collection tool was Gersham and Elliott (1990) Social Skills Questionnaire by Coaches completed. After the pre-test, children with autism were randomly divided into three groups (ie, two groups) Experimental and a control group (15 people were replaced. Then the mind reading concepts training group for 10 sessions And response-oriented treatment group underwent individual training for 7 sessions. Upon completion of the interventions, post-test to Action was taken. Data analysis using covariance analysis statistical test revealed response-based therapy and treatment Mind-reading affects the social skills of children with autism, and mind-reading therapy is more responsive to treatment therapy It is more effective in the amount of social skills components (P <0.01.) The use of these two therapies to Therapists, psychologists and educators recommended for educating autistic children.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Response-based therapy
  • social skills
  • autism
  • mind reading
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Shoshan, Y., &
McNerney, E. (1999). Pivotal response intervention
II: Preliminary long-term outcome data. Journal of
the Association for Persons with Severe
Handicaps, 24(3), 186-198.
Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2006). Pivotal
response treatments for autism: Communication,
social, & academic development. Paul H Brookes
Publishing.
Koegel, R. L., Bradshaw, J. L., Ashbaugh, K., &
Koegel, L. K. (2014). Improving question-asking
initiations in young children with autism using
pivotal response treatment. Journal of autism and
developmental disorders, 44(4), 816-827.
Leekam, S. (2016). Social cognitive impairment and
autism: what are we trying to explain?. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 371(1686), 20150082.
Levin, A. R., Fox, N. A., Zeanah Jr, C. H., & Nelson,
C. A. (2015). Social communication difficulties and
autism in previously institutionalized
children. Journal of the American Academy of Child
& Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(2), 108-115.
Liu, M. J., Ma, L. Y., Chou, W. J., Chen, Y. M., Liu, T.
L., Hsiao, R. C., ... & Yen, C. F. (2018). Effects of
theory of mind performance training on reducing
bullying involvement in children and adolescents
with high-functioning autism spectrum
disorder. PLoS one, 13(1), e0191271.
Masi, A., DeMayo, M. M., Glozier, N., & Guastella, A.
J. (2017). An overview of autism spectrum disorder,
heterogeneity and treatment options. Neuroscience
bulletin, 33(2), 183-193.
Mohammadi, M. R., Ahmadi, N., Khaleghi, A.,
Zarafshan, H., Mostafavi, S. A., Kamali, K., ... &
Shakiba, A. (2019). Prevalence of Autism and its
Comorbidities and the Relationship with Maternal
Psychopathology: A National Population-Based
Study. Archives of Iranian medicine, 22(10), 546-
553.
Mohammadzaheri, F., Koegel, L. K., Rezaee, M., &
Rafiee, S. M. (2014). A randomized clinical trial
comparison between pivotal response treatment
(PRT) and structured applied behavior analysis
(ABA) intervention for children with autism. Journal
of autism and developmental disorders, 44(11), 2769-
2777.
Mohammadzaheri, F., Koegel, L. K., Rezaei, M., &
Bakhshi, E. (2015). A randomized clinical trial
comparison between pivotal response treatment
(PRT) and adult-driven applied behavior analysis
(ABA) intervention on disruptive behaviors in public
school children with autism. Journal of autism and
developmental disorders, 45(9), 2899-2907.
Peterson, C. (2014). Theory of mind understanding and
empathic behavior in children with autism spectrum
disorders. International Journal of Developmental
Neuroscience, 39, 16-21.
Rezayi, S. (2014). Curriculum development for social
cognition (theory of mind) and the effect on social
functioning autistic children with high performance. J
Res Sch Learn Virtual, 1(2), 83-91.
Serra, M., Minderaa, R. B., van Geert, P. L., Jackson,
A. E., Althaus, M., & Til, R. (1995). Emotional
role‐taking abilities of children with a pervasive
developmental disorder not otherwise
specified. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 36(3), 475-490.
Szumski, G., Smogorzewska, J., Grygiel, P., &
Orlando, A. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness
of naturalistic social skills training in developing
social skills and theory of mind in preschoolers with
ASD. Journal of autism and developmental
disorders, 49(7), 2822-2837.
Tsuruya, N., Kobayakawa, M., & Kawamura, M.
(2011). Is “reading mind in the eyes” impaired in
Parkinson’s disease?. Parkinsonism & related
disorders, 17(4), 246-248.
Ventola, P., Friedman, H. E., Anderson, L. C., Wolf, J.
M., Oosting, D., Foss-Feig, J., ... & Pelphrey, K. A.
(2014). Improvements in social and adaptive
functioning following short-duration PRT program:
A clinical replication. Journal of autism and
developmental disorders, 44(11), 2862-2870.
Ya-Lun, T. (2014). The Impact of PRT on Promoting
Social Interactions of High-functioning Autistic
Child in Taiwan. International Journal of
Educational Planning & Administration, 4(1), 85-94.
Zachariah, S. M., Oommen, S. P., & Koshy, B. (2017).
Clinical features and diagnosis of autism spectrum
disorder in children. Current Medical Issues, 15(1),
6.