بررسی نقش احیا کننده خروج کارآفرینانه در کسب و کارهای خانوادگی ایران در دوران شیوع کووید-19

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه کارآفرینی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه کسب و کار جدید،د انشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

3 دانشیار، گروه کارآفرینی سازمانی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: کسب و کارهای خانوادگی می‌توانند فعالیت‌های تجاری را با تعهدات عاطفی حاکم بر خانواده تلفیق نموده و بستری مناسب برای رشد مالی خانواده و اشتغال آفرینی ایجاد نمایند. پژوهش حاضر درصدد شناسایی و تبیین راهکار بهره‌گیری از خروج کارآفرینانه برای احیا کسب و کارهای خانوادگی در ایران در دوران شیوع کووید-19 است.
روش کار: روش تحقیق کیفی می باشد برای انتخاب نمونه و شناسایی موارد مطالعه از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند استفاده شده و چهل بنگاه خانوادگی که در مقوله خروج تجربه داشته‌اند شناسایی که در نهایت بیست و هشت مصاحبه با مالکین آنها به سرانجام رسید.
نتایج: نتایج این پژوهش شواهد بارزی از نقش عمده و موثر خروج کارآفرینانه در احیای مجدد کسب و کار در میان شرکت های خانوادگی در ایران ارائه می‌دهد.
نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می رسد کسب و کارهای خانوادگی به ویژه در دوران شیوع کرونا می تواند نقش موثری در کسب و کرهای جدید برای خانواده ها داشته باشد، با این وجود برای بالا بردن اعتبار بیرونی پژوهش نیاز به تحقیقات بیشتری می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the reviving role of entrepreneurial exit in Iranian family businesses during of COVID-19 Prevalence

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Akhavan 1
  • Seyed Mojtaba Sajjadi 2
  • Kamal Sakhdari 3
1 PhD student, Entrepreneurship Department, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Associate Professor, New Business Department, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Theran, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
3 Assistant Professor, Educational Associate Professor, Organizational entrepreneurship Department, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Theran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Family businesses can combine commercial activities with emotional obligations governing the family and create a suitable platform for the financial growth of the family and job creation. The present study seeks to identify and explain the strategy of taking advantage of entrepreneurial exit to revive family businesses in Iran during of COVID-19 Prevalence.
Methods: The method of qualitative research is to select the sample and identify the study cases, using the purposeful sampling method and identifying forty family businesses that have experience in the exit category, and finally twenty-eight interviews with their owners were completed.
Results: The results of this research provide clear evidence of the major and effective role of entrepreneurial exit in reviving business among family companies in Iran.
Conclusion: It seems that family businesses can play an effective role in new businesses for families, especially during the Corona epidemic, however, more research is needed to increase the external validity of the research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneur
  • Entrepreneurial Exit
  • Family Businesses
  • Economy
  • COVID-19

مراجع

  1. Mair J. Social entrepreneurship: Research as disciplined exploration. The nonprofit sector: A
    research handbook. 2020:333-57.
    2. Mathias BD, Williams DW, Smith AR. Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in
    entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing. 2015;30(1):11-28.
    3. Blake Hylton J, Mikesell D, Yoder J-D, LeBlanc H. Working to instill the entrepreneurial mindset
    across the curriculum. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy. 2020;3(1):86-106.
    4. Langevang T, Gough KV, Yankson PW, Owusu G, Osei R. Bounded entrepreneurial vitality: The
    mixed embeddedness of female entrepreneurship. Economic geography. 2015;91(4):449-73.
    5. Lortie J. For the greater good: Why and how social entrepreneurs exit social ventures. Research
    handbook of entrepreneurial exit: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2015. p. 226-45.
    6. Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH. Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Science.
    2014;60(4):867-87.
    7. Hessels J, Grilo I, Thurik R, van der Zwan P. Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement.
    Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2011;21:447-71.
    8. Stam E, Thurik R, Van der Zwan P. Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets. Industrial and
    Corporate Change. 2010;19(4):1109-39.
    9. DeTienne DR, Chandler GN. Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom:
    A pedagogical approach and empirical test. Academy of management learning & education.
    2004;3(3):242-57.
    10. DeTienne DR. Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process:
    Theoretical development. Journal of business venturing. 2010;25(2):203-15.
    11. Wennberg K, Wiklund J, DeTienne DR, Cardon MS. Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit:
    Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing. 2010;25(4):361-75.
    12. Wennberg K, DeTienne DR. What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of
    research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal. 2014;32(1):4-16.
    13. Bird M, Wennberg K. Why family matters: The impact of family resources on immigrant
    entrepreneurs' exit from entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. 2016;31(6):687-704.
    14. Nielsen K, Sarasvathy SD. Exit perspective on entrepreneurship. The Palgrave Handbook of
    Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Entrepreneurship. 2018:223-45.
    15. Peters B. Early Exits: Exit strategies for entrepreneurs and angel investors (but maybe not venture
    capitalists): Basil Peters; 2009.
    16. Decker C, Mellewigt T. Thirty years after Michael E. Porter: what do we know about business exit?
    Academy of Management Perspectives. 2007;21(2):41-55.
    17. Leroy H, Manigart S, Meuleman M, editors. Exit processes of micro-businesses: the decision to
    transfer. ICSB World Conference, Date: 2007/01/01-2007/01/01, Location: Turku (Finland); 2007.
    18. Winter M, Danes SM, Koh S-K, Fredericks K, Paul JJ. Tracking family businesses and their owners
    over time: panel attrition, manager departure and business demise. Journal of Business Venturing.
    2004;19(4):535-59.
    19. Sakata N, Shiraishi R, Okada Y, editors .Study on Exit Strategy to Promote Introduction of New
    Technology to Safety Management Activities. Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics:
    Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Social and Occupational Ergonomics,
    July 24-28, 20 ,19Washington DC, USA 10; 2020: Springer.
    20. Dalecki L. Entrepreneurial selling in context. Journal of Research in Marketing and
    Entrepreneurship. 2019.
  2. 21. Wong PK, Ho YP, Autio E. Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from
    GEM data. Small business economics. 2005;24:335-50.
    22. Reynolds PD, White SB. The entrepreneurial process: Economic growth, men, women, and
    minorities: Praeger; 1997.
    23. Koładkiewicz I, Wojtyra M. Entrepreneurial exit: Research perspectives and challenges. Problemy
    Zarządzania. 2016;14(3):62.
    24. Hsu DK, Wiklund J, Anderson SE, Coffey BS. Entrepreneurial exit intentions and the businessfamily interface. Journal of Business Venturing. 2016;31(6):613-27.
    25. DeTienne D, Wennberg K. Studying exit from entrepreneurship: New directions and insights.
    International Small Business Journal. 2016;34(2):151-6.
    26. Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Litz R. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An
    extension and integration. Journal of business venturing. 2003;18(4.467-72:)
    27. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy
    of management journal. 2007;50(1):25-32.
    28. Dyer Jr WG, Handler W. Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections.
    Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 1994;19(1):71-83.
    29. Getz D, Carlsen J. Characteristics and goals of family and owner-operated businesses in the rural
    tourism and hospitality sectors. Tourism management. 2000;21(6):547-60.
    30. Parrish S. Successfully Transferring the Family Business: A New Methodology. Journal of Financial
    Service Professionals. 2009;63.)3(
    31. Requejo I, Reyes-Reina F, Sanchez-Bueno MJ, Suárez-González I. European family firms and
    acquisition propensity: A comprehensive analysis of the legal system’s role. Journal of Family
    Business Strategy. 2018;9(1):44-58.
    32. Catuogno S, Arena C, Cirillo A, Pennacchio L. Exploring the relation between family ownership and
    incentive stock options: The contingency of family leadership, board monitoring and financial crisis.
    Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2018;9(1):59-72.
    33. Ahmadpour Daryani M, Yadolahi Farsi J, Samizadeh M. The Role of Family Factors in Creation of
    Family Businesses
    34. (A Case Study: Oil & Textile Industries of Tehran) Journal of Family Research. 2010;5(3):331-45.
    35. Moradi K, Nilipour Tabatabai SA. Investigating the role of small and medium enterprises in the
    development of economic activities of the country. the first international conference on
    management, economics, accounting and educational sciences; Sari: Payam Noor Neka University;
    2013.
    36. Partoafkanan M, GELARD p, Naami A. The role of government in financing and developing
    investment in small and medium-sized businesses. Journal of Investment Knowledge.
    2020;9(35):277-88.
    37. Atafi AH. Investigating and identifying the most important failure factors for small and mediumsized enterprises active in the chemical industry in Mazandaran province. Mazandaran University;
    2017.
    38. Arasti Z, Gholami M. The causes of failure of entrepreneurs in Iran. Entrepreneurship Development
    Quarterly. 2009;2(8):163-84.
    39. Ihua UB, Siyanbola TO. Critical challenges limiting small business performance in Nigeria: an
    exploratory investigation. International Journal of Business and Globalisation. 2012;9(2):171-85.
    40. Levratto N. From failure to corporate bankruptcy: a review. Journal of Innovation and
    Entrepreneurship. 2013;2:1-15.
    41. Coe DT, Helpman E, Hoffmaister AW. International R&D spillovers and institutions. European Economic Review. 2009;53(7):723-41.
    42. Liu T-K, Chen J-R, Huang CC, Yang C-H. E-commerce, R&D, and productivity: Firm-level
    evidence from Taiwan. Information Economics and Policy. 2013;25(4):272-83.
    43. Nawaz N, Jahanian A, Tehreem S. Determinants of employee retention in Pakistan International
    Airlines (PIA). European Journal of Business and Management. 2012;4(7):45-53.
    44. Amaral AM, Baptista R, Lima F. Entrepreneurial exit and firm performance. Frontiers of
    entrepreneurship research. 2007;27(5):1.
    45. Lee Y, Mukoyama T. A model of entry, exit, and plant-level dynamics over the business cycle.
    Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2018;96:1-25.
    46. DeTienne DR, Chirico F. Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the
    threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2013;37(6):1297-318.
    47. Dodd SD, Anderson A, Jack S. Being in time and the family owned firm. Scandinavian Journal of
    Management. 2013;29(1):35-47.
مجله دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
دوره 63، شماره 5
آذر و دی 1399
صفحه 3016-3033

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار